The Free Press Journal

MHADA to sue defaulters for failure to pay `130cr as rent for transit flats

- SWEETY ADIMULAM

The Maharashtr­a Housing and Area Developmen­t Authority (MHADA) is planning to file a recovery suit against defaulting developers, who have been renting transit flats from the authority to provide alternativ­e accommodat­ion to project-affected people, in order to recover Rs 130 crore in arrears going back to 2006.

Not just this, MHADA will also file a first informatio­n report (FIR) against these defaulters, said Vinod Ghosalkar, a former legislator and chairman of the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruc­tion Board (MBRRB) on Wednesday.

“The aim is to recover the dues. Also, the MHADA itself is now undertakin­g various redevelopm­ent projects. Only when these rented transit homes are vacated by these builders can MHADA accommodat­e its own project-affected people. Moreover, these transit houses are in the heart of the city," he pointed out.

As per the MHADA, there is no provision to give corpus to the tenants of redevelopm­ent projects and it cannot give rents as builders do, to bag projects. But since people have learned from experience that builders fail to complete the project on time, they are keen that MHADA should undertake the redevelopm­ent. Ghosalkar said, “In such cases, we need more transit houses in reserve, only then can we go ahead and undertake redevelopm­ent projects.”

“The inhabitant­s of Mumbai — the Marathi manoos is being thrown out of the city. The rents of flats in Mumbai are Rs 25,000 and above. As people cannot afford this, they are forced to stay away from the city. If we get our transit homes back, which have been with the builders from the past several years, we can provide alternativ­e accommodat­ion in Mumbai city itself,” asserted Ghosalkar.

Apart from taking stringent action against these defaulters, the MHADA has also sent a proposal to the state asking clarificat­ion about 21 redevelopm­ent projects in Mahim. Here, the developer has been given a no-objection certificat­e(NOC) but has failed to even start or complete the project. Therefore, in 2012, their NOCs had been cancelled and it was decided not to issue NOCs again.

Ghosalkar said, “Now we have informed the state that people want MHADA to undertake the Mahim project. Until now, MHADA only had the authority to cancel NOCs. Therefore, we have proposed those who want redevelopm­ent by MHADA should be allowed to do so and those who want a developer to undertake the project, too should be considered. This will pave the way for MHADA to undertake redevelopm­ent projects where the builder has failed to complete the task. MHADA can once again acquire these properties and go ahead with the redevelopm­ent, if it gets a nod.”

 ??  ?? The aim is to recover the dues. Also, the MHADA itself is now undertakin­g various redevelopm­ent projects. Only when these rented transit homes are vacated by these builders can MHADA accommodat­e its own project-affected people. Moreover, these transit houses are in the heart of the city. — Vinod Ghosalkar, Ex-legislator and chairman of MBRRB
The aim is to recover the dues. Also, the MHADA itself is now undertakin­g various redevelopm­ent projects. Only when these rented transit homes are vacated by these builders can MHADA accommodat­e its own project-affected people. Moreover, these transit houses are in the heart of the city. — Vinod Ghosalkar, Ex-legislator and chairman of MBRRB

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India