The Free Press Journal

ED slaps case of laundering on Deshmukh

- SOMENDRA SHARMA

The Enforcemen­t Directorat­e (ED) has registered a money-laundering case against former Maharashtr­a Home Minister Anil Deshmukh and others, on the basis of an FIR by the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) against Deshmukh in connection with the corruption allegation­s levelled against him by former Mumbai Police Commission­er Param Bir Singh.

Sources in the agency on Tuesday informed that an Enforcemen­t Case Informatio­n Report (ECIR) has been registered in Mumbai against Deshmukh and searches could be conducted in connection with the case in coming days.

The agency officials also claimed that summons could be issued to Deshmukh and others related with the case and their statements would be recorded by the ED in coming days.

In March, Singh, in his letter to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray had alleged that “Sachin Vaze who was heading the Crime Intelligen­ce Unit of the Crime Branch of the Mumbai Police was called by Deshmukh, to his official residence Dnyaneshwa­r several times in last few months and repeatedly instructed to assist in collection of funds for the Home Minister.”

Around mid-Februar y and thereaf ter, the home minister had called Vaze to his official residence. At that time, one or two staff members of the home minister, including his Personal Secretar y Sanjeev Palande were also present. The home minister expressed to Vaze that he had a target to collect Rs 100 crore a month from bars, restaurant­s and other establishm­ents in Mumbai, Param Bir Singh had further alleged.

Later Param Bir Singh had moved the Supreme Court seeking a CBI probe, but the court had asked him to move the Bombay High Court. While the Bombay High Court dismissed Param Bir Singh’s petition, it took into considerat­ion a PIL filed by Advocate Jayshri Patil, which had also sought a CBI probe against Deshmukh. The Bombay High Court had, on April 5, ordered the CBI to conduct a preliminar y enquir y into the allegation­s levelled against Deshmukh and to submit a report within 15 days.

The CBI had registered a preliminar y enquir y the following day and had started its enquir y. But Deshmukh had denied all the allegation­s made by Singh and moved the Supreme Court against the Bombay High Court’s order. The state of Maharashtr­a too had moved the Supreme Court, but Supreme Court did not give any relief to either Deshmukh or the state.

Following this, a team of CBI officers had recorded the statements of Singh, Deputy Commission­er of Police (Enforcemen­t) Raju Bhujbal, ACP Sanjay Patil and Vaze, in connection with the allegation­s.

The probe team had also recorded the statement of Advocate Jayshri Patil, who had also approached the court seeking a probe into Singh’s allegation­s. The agency had also recorded statements of a Kandivli bar owner and two drivers of Vaze.

On April 24, the CBI had registered an FIR against Deshmukh and others under corruption charges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India