The Free Press Journal

‘BJP betrayed Marathas in quota case’

- SANJAY JOG sanjay.jog@fpj.co.in

Congress, which shares power with the Nationalis­t Congress Party (NCP) and Shiv Sena in Maharashtr­a, on Thursday, leveled serious charges against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS) for allegedly supporting anti-Maratha reservatio­n petitions in the court of law. State Congress chief spokesman Sachin Sawant claimed that the BJP-RSS connection to the organisati­on Save Merit, Save Nation that opposed the Socially and Educationa­lly Backward Classes (SEBC) quota has come out in the open now.

“Isn't this a betrayal of the Maratha community, when BJP helps organisati­ons that oppose the quota. This can't be a mere coincidenc­e. Did BJP prevent the party office bearers from being associated with this organisati­on? We seek a clarificat­ion from it," Sawant said. The Supreme Court, on May 5, in its ruling, had struck down the 12% quota in education and 13% in government jobs for the Maratha community.

Sawant lashed out at BJP for its plan to hold a protest on June 5 against the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government's handling of the Maratha quota. Cabinet sub-committee chief Ashok Chavan also slammed the party for politicisi­ng the issue and misleading the people of the state.

“It is the BJP's policy to pretend that they support the Maratha reservatio­n on one side and to run a campaign to prevent reservatio­n in reality on the other. This is because Save Merit, Save Nation, which is fighting against Maratha reservatio­n in the Supreme Court, has a direct connection with RSS. The majority of the trustees are affiliated to RSS and are from Nagpur,” said Sawant. To substantia­te his claim, Sawant also released a few papers and claimed that the said organisati­on did not exist at the time of the court battle in the Mumbai High Court. “However, after the High Court ruled in favour of reservatio­n, the organisati­on started functionin­g According to the organisati­on’s website, it has sent four petitions against the reservatio­n,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India