Why C.N. Annadurai was buried at the Marina and the row it triggered
The former Chief Minister’s resting place was identified behind the Kambar statue. A controversy erupted over why he was buried and not cremated. Karunanidhi responded that in the burial of Anna, an ancient practice of the Tamils had been followed, and th
Soon after C.N. Annadurai, India’s first Chief Minister belonging to a regional party and founder of the DMK, died in office on February 3, 1969, the Tamil Nadu government decided to bury him on the sands of the Marina, the world’s second longest beach, in Madras. The decision did not go down well with the Congress, the principal Opposition party in the State. The resting place of Anna, as he was popularly called, was identified behind the statue of poet Kambar, opposite the University of Madras buildings. The funeral took place on February 4. “The mortal remains of C.N. Annadurai were today buried in the golden sands of the beach with full military honours, amidst moving scenes of grief and sorrow. As volleys of small arms were fired and platoons of the defence services reversed arms and the wail of the mourning multitude rent the air, the body was laid to rest,” says a report in The Hindu dated February 5, 1969.
‘Enveloped by gloom’
“Morning found the gun carriage drawn up below the 29 steps of the Rajaji Hall which Mr. Annadurai ascended 23 months ago to be sworn in as Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. Rajaji Hall, which then echoed to the joyous greetings of the people, was today enveloped by gloom, as he lay in state,” the report adds. Ministers V. R. Nedunchezhiyan, K. A. Mathiazhagan, S. Madhavan, and S. J. Sadiq Pasha were the “pallbearers” who brought out the body draped with the national flag and the redandblack DMK flag. “As the body was placed on the gun carriage, the crowd broke down and cries of ‘Ayoh Anna’ rent the air. The firing party presented arms, and officers in uniform saluted,” according to the report.
The burial spot, formerly an octogonal concrete structure with cement benches put up for the convenience of beachgoers, was slightly modified and a rectangular pit six feet deep, four feet wide and eight feet long was dug. The floor of the pit was plastered with cement, and its inner sides were lined with greencoloured linoleum. Anna’s body was placed in a teakwood coffin by the pallbearers. On the hexahedronshaped coffin was inscribed: “C. N. Annadurai, age 60, Died on February 3, 1969”.
The funeral ceremony lasted about 10 minutes, at the end of which the then Works Minister, M. Karunanidhi, requested the vast congregation to observe oneminute silence in memory of Anna, who was an embodiment of of “duty, dignity and discipline”.
‘Aimed at evoking reverence’
At that time, a controversy had erupted over why Anna was buried and not cremated. Karunanidhi had told the news agency PTI that in burying Anna, an ancient practice of the Tamils had been followed. He said that even now it was the custom in Tamil Nadu to resort to burial when important members of a family died. Besides, it was proposed to erect a “Samadhi” for Anna. “Only if a Samadhi was erected over the buried body of a leader, it would evoke reverence,” he said.
Days later, after he succeeded Anna as the Chief Minister, Karunanidhi, according to The Hindu report, had explained how he was forced to select the site on the Marina for burial of Anna. “Mr. Karunanidhi said it was the exact spot to which Mr. Annadurai had summoned him and
Mr. Arangannal [legislator] to discuss party politics on his return from the U.S. (from treatment),” the report said.
The issue of Anna’s burial instead of cremation and his final resting place, however, remained politically alive, with Congress MLAs Vinayakam and P.G. Karuthimaran raising the issue in the Assembly. On February 25, Karunanidhi informed the House that the decision to bury Anna’s body instead of cremating it was taken only with the approval of his family members. He said there was nothing “sudden or unilateral” about the decision. He had earlier informed C. Subramaniam, the president of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee, and E.V.K. Sampath about the decision.
‘A public resort’
Karuthimaran contended that there was a feeling among the people that Anna’s body should not have been buried in the beach, “which was a public resort”. To this, Karunanidhi responded that he could not understand how there could be public opposition because he saw even now unending streams of people thronging Anna’s square to pay homage to the departed leader. “Where are the people who object to the burial?
Have they descended from Heaven? I try to look for them everywhere but I do not find them,” he said. The Chief Minister also posed, “Did the Congress consult the other parties when Gandhiji was cremated and his ashes were immersed in the rivers of the country?”
‘Not consulted’
The following day, however, Subramaniam said that at no time was he consulted about the choice of the place to bury Anna’s body. “On the other hand, when I heard about the proposal for burial of Annadurai’s body at the Marina, which came as a complete surprise to every body, I sent word through a very high official that the Ministers should have a second thought about this proposal because I found even at that stage there was objection to this proposal from various quarters, including the family of the late Chief Minister,” he said. However, Anna’s son C.N.A. Parimalam denied that the decision was taken against the wishes of the members of his family. He added that the decision was taken only after consultations with Anna’s family.
Nonetheless, Subramaniam stuck to his statement. “I am sorry that the late Chief Minister’s burial at the Marina has turned into a controversy. But I was not responsible for it. I have made my statement with a full sense of responsibility and I stand by it. As a matter of fact, I have much more to say about it, but refrain from saying so, because I do not want to carry on this controversy further,” he said in a statement.
Councillors raised questions
In August that year, at a meeting of the Madras Corporation Council, Congress councillors raised questions about the construction of the Anna Samadhi. One councillor, Kuppuswami, asked whether the Corporation’s permission was obtained before erecting it. Another councillor, Munuswami, said the Corporation’s permission should have been obtained for this, but there was no time then. It was taken for granted that the Council would have agreed to it had its permission been sought. Kuppuswami said the Commissioner should have placed the matter before the Council for ratification. Two years later, in September 1973, Karunanidhi lit the “eternal flame” at the Anna Samadhi. Not only does the flame continue to flicker but Karunanidhi’s final resting place too is behind that of his mentor’s Samadhi. Also at the Marina are the mausoleums of former Chief Ministers M.G. Ramachandran and his protégé Jayalalithaa.