Courts should nip in bud e‰orts by vested groups: Justice Datta

The Supreme Court judge, Justice Dipankar Datta, in his separate opinion upholding the electronic voting machine (EVM) system, said constitutional courts should “nip in the bud” a “fast-developing” trend among “certain vested groups” to undermine the achievements of the nation earned through the hard work and dedication of its sincere workforce.

“There seems to be a concerted e§ort to discredit, diminish, and weaken the progress of this great nation on every possible frontier. Any such e§ort, or rather attempt, has to be nipped in the bud. No constitutional court, far less this court, would allow such attempt to succeed as long as it [the court] has a say in the matter,” Justice Datta who constituted the two-judge Bench with Justice Khanna, observed on Friday.

The judge’s comments were triggered by submissions made in court by a petitioner, Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by advocate

Prashant Bhushan, to revert to the paper ballot system of polling. He found the suggestion “inexplicable”.

“It is only improvements in the EVMs or even a better system that people would look forward to in the ensuing years,” Justice Datta said.

Arbitrary power

The judge noted that neither the Election Commission (EC) nor any other authority claims to possess arbitrary power over the interests of an individual voter and seek cover from the sunlight of judicial scrutiny if, indeed, a valid cause is set up for interference.

“After all, ‘let right be done’ is also the motto of our nation like any other civilised State. That the sanctity of the electoral process has to be secured at any cost has never been in doubt,” Justice Datta noted. The judge proceeded to bolster the resolve of the EC against periodical challenges to electoral processes, “which gain momentum particularly when General Elections are imminent”.