The Hindu (Visakhapatnam)

Turnout data update without total voter count leads to row

Opposition „ags issue after EC shares turnout numbers several days after two phases; CPI(M) says fears over manipulati­on of results remain as voter numbers can be altered at the time of counting

-

More than 10 days after Phase 1 and four days after Phase 2 of polling for the ongoing general elections, the Election Commission (EC) released the Ÿnal voter turnout Ÿgures for the two rounds on April 30. While Phase 1 saw a turnout of 66.14%, for Phase 2, it was 66.7%.

However, the poll body did not release the total number of voters in each constituen­cy. The Opposition parties, which had earlier in the day raised this issue majorly on social media platforms, pointed this out after the EC released the data.

Polling was held in 102 constituen­cies on April 19 under Phase 1, while 88 seats went to the polls on April 26 in Phase 2.

In Phase 1, the turnout of male voters was 66.22% while that of women electors was 66.07%. The correspond­ing Ÿgures for Phase 2 were 66.99% and 66.42%, according to a statement from the EC on Tuesday.

During the last general elections in 2019, the Ÿrst phase Ÿnal turnout was shared two days after the voting. The turnout for the Ÿrst phase in 2019 was 69.43% and for the second phase was 69.44%.

Both phases have shown a dip in voting percentage­s.

Seeks transparen­cy

After the EC released the Ÿgures, CPI(M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury posted on X: “Finally ECI has put out the Ÿnal voter turnout Ÿgures for the Ÿrst 2 phases which are substantia­lly, not marginally as is normal, higher than the initial Ÿgures. But why are the absolute numbers of voters in each parliament­ary constituen­cy not put out? Percentage­s are meaningles­s unless this Ÿgure is known.”

“Apprehensi­ons of manipulati­on of results continue as total voter numbers can be altered at the time of counting. Total number of voters in each constituen­cy was always available on ECI website till 2014! ECI must be transparen­t and put out this data”.

Trinamool Congress leader Derek O’Brien said: “Four days after Phase 2 ends, Election Commission releases Ÿnal voting Ÿgures. A bump up ( jump in turnout) of 5.75% from what EC released 4 days ago! Is this normal? What am I missing here?”

Earlier in the day, Opposition leaders questioned the delay in sharing of data by the EC. In a post on X, Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh said: “For the Ÿrst time, even 11 days after the Ÿrst phase of the polls and four days after the second phase, the Ÿnal voter turnout has not been published by the ECI. In the past, ECI used to publish the Ÿnal voter turnout immediatel­y after voting or within 24 hours. Only approximat­e polling Ÿgures are available on ECI’s website. What accounts for this delay?”

“Additional­ly, the number of registered voters in each Lok Sabha constituen­cy and the Assembly constituen­cies included in that Lok Sabha constituen­cy is also not available on the Commission’s website,” he posted on X.

Mr. Yechury also pointed out that the delay in the release of data was “very disturbing”. “This raises serious apprehensi­ons on manipulati­on of results,” he said.

 ?? AFP ?? The Opposition also expressed worry over the 5.75% jump in voter turnout between initial numbers and final figure for phase 2.
AFP The Opposition also expressed worry over the 5.75% jump in voter turnout between initial numbers and final figure for phase 2.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India