The Hindu (Visakhapatnam)

SC raps Uttarakhan­d licensing authority in Patanjali case

-

Licensing body was criticised for cancelling 14 licences of Divya Pharmacy only after SC interventi­on

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed dissatisfa­ction at the Uttarakhan­d State Licensing Authority, saying it only “woke up” and moved against Patanjali Ayurved and its cofounder Baba Ramdev like “lightning” for repeated violations committed under the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act after the court intervened and passed orders.

A Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah were not impressed by the authority’s aŠdavit which said it had, on April 15, suspended the manufactur­ing licences of Divya Pharmacy and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. for 14 products — Swasari Gold, Swasari Vati, Bronchom, Swasari Pravahi, Swasari Avaleh, Mukta Vati Extra Power, Lipidom, Bp Grit, Madhugrit, Madhunashi­ni Vati Extra Power, Livamrit Advance, Livogrit, Eyegrit Gold and Patanjali Drishti Eye Drop — under Rule 159 (1) of The Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

“This is something you should have done as a routine. So, if you want to, you can move like lightning. Otherwise, you simply do not,” Justice Kohli addressed senior advocate Dhruv Mehta, who appeared for the State Licensing Authority (SLA).

“It was only after our order that you [SLA] realised that there is a law — Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. You were oblivious of it till then. Now, you wake up and realise you have power… Why were you in limbo for nearly six years?” Justice Kohli asked.

Justice Amanullah said the SLA has “shot from the court’s shoulders”.

Dr. Mithilesh Kumar, Joint Director State Licensing Authority, Ayurvedic and Unani Services, tendered an unconditio­nal apology to the Court. However, the court took exception to Mr. Kumar’s submission that the SLA had been “vigilant in its duties”.

The Bench gave the SLA another 10 days to Ÿle fresh aŠdavits.

The case was posted for hearing on May 14.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India