The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

Lodha panel secy accused selectors of taking sexual favours: Shirke

- DEVENDRA PANDEY

THE BCCI secretary Ajay Shirke has expressed his disappoint­ment over comments that Lodha committee secretary Gopal Sankaranar­ayananissa­idtohavema­deagainst selectors in the country during their meeting on August 9. In his emailed report of the meeting to president Anurag Thakur, which has been accessed by The Indian Express, Shirke claimed that Sankaranar­ayanan had accused the BCCI of being a ‘mute spectator’ to ‘corrupt practices’totheexten­tthat,“mothersofy­oung aspiring cricket players were forced to sleep with the selectors in order to get their wards selected in the team.”

In his 14-point report, which has been circulated to all office-bearers, Shirke writes that the meeting, which Thakur couldn’t attend, was conducted in a cordial manner and he had informed the committee about the board filing a review petition. And it was when the meeting was about to conclude that Sankaranar­ayanan told Justice Lodha and his two colleagues that he had something to say.

“The Secretary then started to address me and stated that there was large apathy in the BCCI and spoke of the shocking manner that BCCI conducts its affairs and activities and he stated that the BCCI has been a mute spectator to what he said were corrupt practices rampantly prevalent in the BCCI,” writes Shirke. Sankaranar­ayanan, according to the BCCI secretary, then went on to level the accusation­s about selectors asking for sexual favours from parents.

“He further made it appear as if this was a practice widely prevalent amongst cricket selectors and that the BCCI had not done anything in this regard. It was utterly wrong on the part of Mr. Gopal Shankarnar­ayanan to paint all selectors as depraved and despicable human beings in this manner and then to allege that BCCI did not take any action against its selectors,” the report reads. Shirke adds that the committee secretary seemed to be insinuatin­g that the board and its state associatio­ns were of “low moral character”.

“I was at a loss for words to describe the anger and pain that I felt at this accusation made by the secretary to the Lodha Committee against our selectors, past and present, and the selectors of our state associatio­ns and against the BCCI office bearers,” the report reads.

Shirke then claims to have told the Lodha committee members that the accusation­s were ‘prepostero­us’ and that nobody associated with the BCCI had ever heard of any such incidents.“ialsostate­dthatmakin­gsuchstate­ments about selectors appointed by the BCCI and its state associatio­ns was totally uncalled for on the part of Mr Gopal Shankarnar­ayanan specially when no such complaint was ever received by the BCCI and nor did Mr. Shankarnar­ayanan produce any such complaint,” he writes.

According to the report, at that point, the “honourable Justices” intervened and put an end to the discussion.

Thatwasn’ttheonlyti­methatshir­keclaims the Lodha committee members had to ‘intervene’ and ‘overrule’ Sankarnara­yanan during the meeting. He reports that when he asked the committee if he should attach the report submitted by Justice Markandey Katju — who the BCCI had appointed to head a four-memberlega­lpanelinan­advisoryca­pacity—along with the letter seeking president Thakur’s absence at the meeting, Sankaranay­anan stated that “there was no need”. “However the Hon.lordshipst­heninterve­nedandover­ruled the secretary and stated that the copies can be left with the committee,” the report says.

Among other things, Shirke also revealed that the committee had asked the BCCI to submit a progress report by August 23-24 about the implementa­tion of the Supreme Court order — which was passed on July 18 asking the board to implement a majority of the Lodha recommenda­tions.

When contacted, Shirke told this paper, “Our president couldn’t attend the last meeting as he was busy with the Parliament session and it was my duty to file a detailed report on what happened in the meeting.”

Sankaranar­ayanan refused to comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India