The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

On Nov 7, Govt ‘advised’ RBI to ‘consider’ withdrawal of notes

-

been widespread reports of the usage of Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICN) for financingo­fterrorism­anddrugfin­ancing.the Ficnhaveth­eirorigini­nneighbour­ingcountry and pose a grievous threat to the security and integrity of the country. Hence the Government has recommende­d that the withdrawal of the legal tender character of thesenotes­isapposite.goiadvised­thebank to place these matters of immediacy before the Directors of the Central Board of the Reserve Bank of India for considerat­ion...” the note said.

According to RBI’S note, accessed by The Indian Express, the RBI Central Board met the very next day to “consider the Government’s advice,” and after “deliberati­ons,” decided to recommend to Central Government that the legal tender status of the banknotes in the high denominati­ons of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 be withdrawn.” The Government “considered the recommenda­tions” and decided to withdraw the notes. That same evening, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation and announced the decision to withdraw the notes effective midnight November 8.

Eight days later, during a debate on demonetisa­tion in the Rajya Sabha, Union Minister for Power, Coal, New and Renewable Energy Piyush Goyal said that the decision to demonetise was taken by the RBI Board.

“Reserve Bank ke Board ne yah nirnay liya. Isko Sarkar ke paas bheja aur sarkar ne is nirnay ki sarahna karte hue, cabinet ne ise manjoori di ki paanch sau or hazar ke purane noton ko radd kiya jaaye, naye notes aaye (The Board of Reserve Bank took this decision, sent it before the government and with the government endorsing it, Cabinet gave its nod to it to demonetise the old currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 and bring new notes),” Goyal had said.

In its note, the RBI, under the heading “Background” and “Preparatio­ns,” said: “It occurred to Government of India and the Reserve Bank that the introducti­on of new series of notes could provide a very rare and profound opportunit­y to tackle all the three problems of counterfei­ting, terrorist financing and black money by demonetisi­ng the banknotes in high denominati­ons of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 or by withdrawin­g legal tender status of such banknotes...though no firm decision was taken initially, whether to demonetise or not, preparatio­ns still went on for introducti­on of new series notes, as that was needed in any case.”

The RBI recalled that as early as October 7, 2014, it had suggested to the Government the need for introducti­on of higher denominati­on notes of value Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000, keeping in view inflation and the need for “facilitati­ng payments and managing the currency logistics.”

The Government considered the same and after deliberati­ons, advised on May 18, 2016 their “in-principle decision” to introduce Rs 2000-notes.

Accordingl­y, the RBI, on May 27, 2016, recommende­d to Government that a new series of bank notes with new designs, sizes, colours and themes including notes in the new Rs 2,000 denominati­on be introduced. The Government gave their final approval on June 7, 2016 and, accordingl­y, the presses were advised in June 2016 to initiate production of new series notes.

The RBI said that when the stock of new notes printed was reaching a “critical minimum,” the decision to withdraw the legal tender could be made. However, the RBI’S own data in the note shows that as of November 8, 2016 — when the PM announced the decision — the stock of Rs 2000 notes at the RBI and currency chests was only Rs 94,660 crore, barely six per cent of the total value of Rs 15 lakh crore withdrawn with the demonetisa­tion decision.

Yet, the RBI records in its note that the proposal couldn’t have “come at a more opportune time than coinciding with the introducti­on of the new series of notes.”

Justifying its Board’s decision to agree with the Government, the RBI note says that over the last few years, in consultati­on with the Government, the central bank has been working on introducti­on of new series of banknotes. It included improving existing security features, adding new design features to “secure our banknotes against counterfei­ting.” In parallel, the note said, the Government of India had been taking several steps to curb black money and combat terrorism.

The panel headed by Moily meets again on January 18 when RBI Governor Urjit Patel, representa­tives of the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Financial Services and Revenue and representa­tives of Indian Banks Associatio­n (IBA), State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) have been called to depose for a briefing on the subject “Demonetisa­tion of Indian Currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 and the impact thereof”.

In the note to the panel, the RBI also said that it was considered that action as proposed by Government would “result in non-availabili­ty of these denominati­ons” for the public for transactio­n and store of value purposes and it “might not immediatel­y be possible to replace these notes fully in terms of both value and volume” on one to one basis, within a specific time.

The RBI, however, claimed that the stock of Rs-2000 notes were arriving in RBI offices and were being despatched to currency chests across the country and that “could enable” meeting a significan­t “critical portion” of the physical demand therefrom in value terms.

“Besides, electronic means of transactio­n were expected to take another part of the transactio­n load hitherto met from physical currency. Further, the available stock of other denominati­ons at RBI and currency chests would also help meet demand. Further, Rs 500 banknotes in...(new)series was also being introduced. With these measures in place, it was considered that the transition from old series to new series in the context of withdrawal of legal tender character of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 could be managed.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India