The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

No case against Marans, misreading of files led to Aircel-maxis probe: Court

Special court dismisses charges of corruption and money-laundering levelled by CBI and ED

- KAUNAIN SHERIFF M

UPA TELECOM MINISTER, BROTHER, TWO FIRMS GET CLEAN CHIT

STATING THAT the “entire case” on the Aircel-maxis deal was based on “misreading of official files”, a special court in New Delhi gave a clean chit Thursday to former telecom minister Dayanidhi Maran, his brother Kalanithi Maran and two firms, dischargin­g them of charges of corruption and money laundering in cases probed by the CBI and Enforcemen­t Directorat­e.

A senior ED official said the agency will challenge the discharge order. Officials of the CBI offered no immediate comment, saying they were yet to receive the detailed order.

Dischargin­g the Maran brothers, Special Judge O P Saini said “legally admissible evidence” was “wholly lacking” in the probe that was conducted. The CBI had alleged that the Marans received a bribe of Rs 742 crore for “coercing” C Sivasankar­an to sell his telecom company Aircel to Malaysia-based Maxis.

The entire case, the judge said, was based on “contradict­ory statements of the witnesses”. The court also gave a clean chit to Sun Direct TV (P) Ltd and South Asia Entertainm­ent Holdings Limited, Mauritius.

In addition to the Maran brothers, the CBI had named Kuala Lumpur-based business tycoon T Ananda Krishnan, and Maxis director Ralph Marshall in its chargeshee­t for offences punishable under Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and under relevant provisions of the ■ Marans got bribe of Rs 742 crore for coercing Sivasankar­an to sell Aircel to Maxis ■ Sivasankar­an tried to resist, wanted to retain 26 per cent of shareholdi­ng ■ Rs 742 crore paid for Dayanidhi by Mauritius firms via companies owned by Kalanithi ■ That they are real brothers, shareholde­rs not sign of any conspiracy ■ Kalanithi firm money for Dayanidhi only a perception or suspicion, not enough for prosecutio­n ■ Legally admissible evidence wholly lacking... contradict­ory statements of witnesses

 ??  ?? DAYANIDHI MARAN
DAYANIDHI MARAN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India