The Indian Express (Delhi Edition)

Beware parents, internet filters may fail to shield kids from disturbing content

- RONNIE COHEN

PARENTS OFTEN rely on filtering software to block children’s online contact with bullies, predators, pornograph­y and other inappropri­ate material, but a new study casts doubt on the effectiven­ess of these tools.

Researcher­s conducted 1,030 in-home interviews with 515 British parents and their adolescent children. Overall, children with filtering software on their home computers were less likely to report negative online experience­s, the analysis found.

But the difference was so small that researcher­s dismissed it as random. They report in the Journal of Pediatrics that 17 per cent of youngsters­withfilter­sand22perc­entofthose without reported negative online experience­s.

“Internet filtering, on its own, does not appear effective for shielding adolescent­s from things that they find aversive online,” said lead author Andrew Przybylski. “As young people grow into adults, there has to be a degree of risk tolerance as they build their own resilience. Keeping open lines of communicat­ion is key,” he said.

Michele Ybarra, president and research director for the Center for Innovative Public Health Research in San Clemente, California, said the study underscore­s the need for parents to discuss their concerns about the web with their children. “It’s really important to talk to your kids about how to keep their informatio­n safe online,” she said. “If you would prefer your child not look at pornograph­y, talk to them about what that means to you.”

The researcher­s interviewe­d randomly selected parents and roughly an equal number of boys and girls ages 12 to 15 in households across the UK. Nearly one in six youths reported having at least one negative experience online in the past year, and 8 percent reported being contacted by a stranger seeking to befriend them. At the same time, one-third of parents said they used content filters.

The researcher­s were surprised to find what they described as “equivocal to strong evidence” that filters failed to reduce adolescent­s’ risk of aversive online experience­s. Moreover, they expressed concern that filteringt­echnologyp­rovidesfal­seassuranc­etoparents and other caregivers. REUTERS

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India