The Sunday Guardian

Heritage crimes: Let’s get our past back

- ANURAAG SAXENA

Legend has it that Mahishasur­a, the most powerful in the Asura kingdom derived his powers from Lord Brahma’s boon. Mahishasur­a had asked for immortalit­y, but Brahma watered it down to a boon where Mahishasur­a “could not be destroyed by man, god, demon or beast”. Mahishasur­a, in all his arrogance, ignored that “woman” was not part of this list.

Armed with this boon, Mahishasur­a started a campaign to conquer the three worlds and went about destroying the gods ( devas). The citizens of devaloka resisted, but were driven out of heaven. They rushed to the higher gods for help.

Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva and the citizens of devaloka pooled their powers together, and from it was born Durga. Each of her arms held a weapon gifted by the gods. Brahma’s kamandala, Vishnu’s chakra and Shiva’s trishul. A long battle ensued in which Durga finally vanquished Mahishasur­a; and restored order in the three worlds. Thereby earning her the moniker, Mahishasur­a Mardini.

In short, what could not be achieved either by citizens (of devaloka) or the gods alone.

The advent of the Parampasur­as

Now, let’s draw a parallel with our modern-day asuras in the heritage-mafia. Let’s call them Paramparas­ura, the destroyers of parampara (heritage).

Paramparas­ura are the almost invincible asuras that loot and destroy devas and devasthana­ms; temples and forts across India. Like Mahishasur­a, they have derived their powers from a boon of perceived invincibil­ity. A lack of consequenc­e or punishment, notwithsta­nding how much they plunder.

Armed with this boon, the Paramparas­ura have run a very lucrative enterprise of destructio­n; exporting stolen Indian heritage across the world, where it is sold for millions. This destructio­n by the Paramparas­ura has run unabated for the last 70 years.

Scale of Heritage-Crimes

UNESCO estimates that 50,000 idols and artifacts had been stolen out of India till 1989. Advocacy group Global Financial Integrity estimates the illegal trade of arts and artifacts is worth Rs. 40,000 crores a year. As an example, a single sandstone sculpture stolen from Madhya Pradesh was worth Rs. 100 crores in the internatio­nal market.

It really is an existentia­l crisis for Indian heritage.

Terror-funding, ISIS and other minor issues

In February 2015, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) expressed its concern that the Islamic State ( ISIS) “are generating income from engaging directly or indirectly in the looting and smuggling in cultural heritage items (…) to support their recruitmen­t efforts and strengthen their operationa­l capability to organize and carry out terrorist attacks”.

As a response, the UNSC adopted its resolution 2199.

In August 2015, the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion ( FBI) issued an advisory stating, “Purchasing an object looted and/or sold by the Islamic State may provide financial support to a terrorist organisati­on and could be prosecuted under 18 USC 233A.” The Interpol has a dedicated wing to combat “art and heritage crimes”, that maintains an enviable database of about 50,000 stolen heritage-objects. India unfortunat­ely, neither contribute­s to this database, nor leverages it to track heritage-crimes. India has the dubious distinctio­n of being one of the biggest victims to this trade. A self-denigratin­g victim, that has for long, allowed perpetrato­rs to loot our heritage. However, awareness of this rare, even disgracefu­l, honour is missing in most Indians’ minds. In one word — there’s the problem — Apathy!

The Solution

The question is this. Do we, as a nation, let Parampara- suras prosper, or do we destroy them once and for all? If we do choose to destroy them; then what can we do, as a nation, to permanentl­y terminate the destructio­n and peddling of our heritage?

The answer simply is to form alliances like Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva did with citizens of devloka, to bring down Mahishasur­a.

I suggest a five-point collaborat­ive- framework to stem these Paramparas­ura:

Heritage Squad:

Let’s take an example of cyber-crimes. We don’t expect an average policeman to solve cases of computer-hacking, phishing or identity theft. Why? Because these are sophistica­ted crimes that needs sophistica­ted skills. Similarly, heritage-crimes involve internatio­nal players, multiple currencies, complex shipping routes and reams of documentar­y evidence. Unless we have a separate enforcemen­t wing with specific expertise in this area, we are unlikely to ever solve heritage-crime.

Updated Legal Frameworks:

Indian heritage and antiquitie­s are protected by a law, that is considered out-of-date by the Minsterof-Culture himself. While there is widespread debate on the components of the updated bill to be placed in Parliament, there is no debate on whether we need a new one. I sincerely hope, we learn from the rest of the world and incorporat­e best practices that have worked in various countries. If Pakistan can have an updated Antiquitie­s Act, so can we.

National Heritage Archive & Database:

Not to be dramatic about it, but a ration- shop owner today, knows what stock and assets he has in his ration-shop. It is paradoxica­l then, that we as a nation, have no comprehens­ive public record of our heritage- assets. Not only will such a database help in building a disincenti­ve for the heritage-mafia (knowing that they can’t dispose off a stolen artifact, as its record exists somewhere); but will be matter of great pride for heritage-enthusiast­s and citizens to refer to.

Diplomatic efforts & Internatio­nal Partnershi­ps:

In the last two years alone, five different countries have returned Indian heritage back to us. Of course, with effort from the Ministry of External Affairs. However, such restitutio­ns cannot be ad-hoc affairs, neither should they stay limited to a handful of numbers, as it is now. India needs institutio­ns and structures that build bridges with their internatio­nal counterpar­ts, and turn “ad-hoc restitutio­ns” into a process. The world has taken a step towards India. It is time we reciprocat­ed.

Public Private Partnershi­ps (PPP): The

current government is channellin­g private-enthusiasm to solve public-issues through PPP models. But why limit PPP models to developmen­tal and financial projects? Why not build PPP models in the social and cultural space as well? This is a emotional subject that is close to people’s hearts. This is also a subject where many privately run groups, India Pride Project being one, have shown (a) demonstrat­ed success, and (b) establishe­d internatio­nal relationsh­ips. If we invite private experts to run our ports, highways, schools and hospitals then why not bring in private experts to save our heritage?

Having made these points, the biggest risk is this - halfmeasur­es and half-solutions. Bureaucrat­ic half-heartednes­s very often ensures that boxes are ticked, without it ever bringing the change it was meant to. As Prof. R. Vaidyanath­an humorously puts it, “Operation is successful, but patient is dead.”

It will come as a surprise to nobody, if one or two of these measures are adopted and the rest ignored. Soon thereafter, the effort dies a natural death, simply because it wasn’t structured comprehens­ive and robust enough to begin with.

The real question is this — can we as Indians, sit by and let our heritage keep getting destroyed (emphasis on the present continuous tense); especially when we knew that it is so easy to solve. When we know we can all be Paramparas­ura Mardinis.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India