The Sunday Guardian

No possibilit­y of a consensus President

- CONTINUED FROM P2

about ideologica­l issues and credential­s of the selected person on whose name there could be a general agreement. It is apparent that the BJP would have one of its own as the Presidenti­al probable, a matter which would ideologica­lly not sit well with the Left as well as other “secular” parties.

It is common knowledge that the Opposition has already sounded Mahatma Gandhi’s grandson and former West Bengal Governor, Gopal Krishna Gandhi, as well as Babu Jagjivan Ram’s daughter and former Lok Sabha Speaker, Meira Kumar to be prepared for a showdown for the coveted position. Since the numbers are not on the sides of the Opposition, it would be safe to assume that it would merely be a token fight if either of the two persons or someone else is shortliste­d for the sparring encounter.

Significan­tly, the Opposition is not alone in keeping its final strategy in abeyance. Within the BJP and the larger Sangh Parivar as well, there is no unanimity on any single individual. Multiple names are doing the rounds and the Sangh appears to be equally unsure of the ultimate choice. Several meetings of Sangh functionar­ies have already been held on the subject and parleys with the BJP are in an inconclusi­ve stage. It can be said that consensus is so far eluding the Sangh itself, but after another few rounds of discussion­s, a panel of probables may emerge. Therefore, it is not surprising that several names of persons, with varied background­s and caste-cum-community and regional breakup, who could be politicall­y useful to the BJP in future elections, have been doing the rounds. Some of them are perceived to be close to the Prime Minister and thus the inference that can be drawn is that they would be in the final shortlist.

There is little doubt that Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has led his party to several impressive victories in elections since the BJP’s historic win in the 2014 Parliament­ary elections, would have an overriding say in the matter.

However, a section of the Sangh is of the view that the announceme­nt of the likely Presidenti­al candidate should be made only after a clearance from Nagpur. To support their contention, it is being pointed out that the Sangh had overruled senior leaders of the BJP, while declaring Modi as the party’s Prime Ministeria­l face in 2014. Similarly, the prerogativ­e to do the same should also lie with the RSS and its Sarsangcha­lak, Mohan Bhagwat.

On 25 July, Pranab Mukherjee’s tenure ends and he has made it amply clear that he would consider the option of a second term only if his name is proposed by the government. In the current political scenario, this would not happen, unless difference­s in the Sangh Parivar over the nominee’s choice compel the ruling dispensati­on to play it safe by sticking to status quo.

There is no doubt that Pranab Mukherjee is perhaps the most accomplish­ed leader in terms of his vast experience and overall acceptance across party lines. He had nominated himself for the position in 2012, compelling Sonia Gandhi to support his candidacy, despite the fact that the current Vice President, Hamid Ansari was her first choice. Senior Congress leaders had also advised the Congress president that oppos- ing Mukherjee’s name and pitting someone else against him in an avoidable contest would create internal problems within the party.

It is obvious that Sonia Gandhi was unprepared to take the risk, which her mother-in-law Indira Gandhi had taken in 1969, following the untimely death of President Zakir Hussain. The top leadership of the party was in favour of nominating Neelam Sanjiva Reddy, the then Lok Sabha Speaker, for the coveted position, but Indira Gandhi had a different view. Giving the call for a conscience vote, she backed Vice President V.V. Giri after breaking away from the party controlled by S. Nijilingap­pa, K. Kamraj, S.K. Patil, Morarji Desai and others. In a closely fought contest, whose outcome would have had a definite bearing on Indira Gandhi’s continuati­on as Prime Minister, Giri defeated Reddy in the historic election.

The anxious moments prior to the declaratio­n of the result are aptly captured in the memoirs of D.P. Mishra, described as Chanakya in political circles, who stood by the Prime Minister in her battle against the discredite­d Syndicate. D.P. Mishra was the father of Brajesh Mishra, who served as the Principal Secretary and National Security Adviser to former Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee. D.P. Mishra has recalled in the memoirs that once it became clear that Giri was eventually going to win, he picked up his grandson’s toy and after winding the key, put it on the table so that the tin drummer could play its beat on his miniature drum. Indira Gandhi’s ecstasy knew no bounds and she started dancing to the beat of the toy drummer, much to the delight of all those present.

There have been symbolic feuds in the past for the post of the Head of the State. Commencing with the joint Opposition in 1967 pitting Subba Rao, former Chief Justice of India, against Dr Zakir Hussain, there have been innumerabl­e instances featuring contestant­s who had zilch chance of victory, but were fielded just for the sake of ensuring that the ruling party would not take things for granted. During Vajpayee’s tenure, the Congress and the BJP had zeroed in on the then Vice President Krishan Kant to succeed K.R. Narayanan, post-discussion­s between K. Natwar Singh and Brajesh Mishra . As things turned out, Krishan Kant was left high and dry and Pramod Mahajan and others convinced the party and Prime Minister Vajpayee to go for Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. Incidental­ly, Abdul Kalam was hailed as the people’s President and one of the finest incumbents to occupy the august office. However, the Left parties did not exhibit the grace to allow a unanimous election and thus fielded veteran INA leader Lakshmi Sahgal against him to offer a clash.

In 2007, the BJP and its allies, knowing full well that Pratibha Patil, who was the Presidenti­al nominee of the UPA, would emerge as a clear winner, decided to offer a perfunctor­y challenge by backing Bhairon Singh Shekhwat for the post. In the same vein, Pranab Mukherjea faced former Lok Sabha Speaker P. A. Sangma in a match, which was over before it began since the Meghalaya leader had insufficie­nt support.

Therefore, after the ruling dispensati­on and its allies firm up the name of the next President, the long wait for the important announceme­nt on both sides may end sooner than expected.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India