The Sunday Guardian

An eerie horror flick that is worth watching once ANNABELLE: CREATION

-

Director: David F Sandberg Starring: Miranda Otto, Philippa Coulthard, Stephanie Sigman, Alicia Vela-Bailey, Anthony LaPaglia, Talitha Bateman The silences are what you dread in

Whenever there is a lull in the storytelli­ng, you always know that the next jolt is about to be felt. The film is very effective in giving its audience the collywobbl­es, which is precisely what they want from a story like this. They know that they’re being strung along and grossly manipulate­d but that is part of the pleasure.

This is the prequel to 2014’s It deliberate­ly takes its time in cranking up. The early scenes portray a family living an idyllic life in dusty, Midwestern 1940s America. Doll maker Samuel Mullins (Anthony LaPaglia) dotes on his beautiful young daughter. They play hide and seek together. “Find me,” she writes on little scraps of paper as they track one another round the big, draughty old house.

Gary Dauberman’s script plays with our expectatio­ns, preparing us for shocks that (at first) don’t always come. The film is also surprising­ly picturesqu­e. The filmmakers pay exhaustive attention to period detail. We may be in post-war America but Mullins’ home, with all its dolls, its wooden floors and high ceilings, has a Victorian feel.

After the slow and tasteful build-up, it’s only a matter of time until the bloodletti­ng begins in earnest. Even then, the supernatur­al elements are initially kept in check. Who needs an evil doll when you can splatter characters onto the road in freak car accidents?

The film’s plot doesn’t bear much scrutiny. For reasons that no one even begins to explain, 12 years after Mullins and his sickly wife (Miranda Otto) suffer a grievous bereavemen­t, a bus full of Catholic orphan girls and a Romanian nun, Sister Charlotte (the improbably glamorous Stephanie Sigman), turns up on their doorstep.

As if to make up for the relative subtlety of the early scenes, director David F Sandberg soon moves into full Grand Guignol mode. It’s no longer a matter of creaking doors as he cheerily veers off in an Exorcistli­ke direction. The little girl most likely to become possessed is Janice (played with plenty of gumption and intelligen­ce by Talitha Bateman).

She is a precocious young teenager who has her leg in a brace. Physically, at least, she is the weakest of the orphans. “She mustn’t go near that doll,” she is warned… advice which, of course, she completely ignores.

Once the doll is out of the cupboard and up to its murderous misdeeds, any meaningful efforts at telling a coherent story are abandoned. The only intention of the film from this point onwards is to scare us rotten. The devil doll has such powers that not even crucifixes or ancient prayers can keep it in check.

“What do you need,” one orphan naively asks. “Your soul,” comes the inevitable hissed rejoinder. Nor is the evil-doing confined to night time. Some of the eeriest scenes here take place in full daylight.

The filmmakers are very inventive in the way they use everything they can find in the old house and the farmyard, whether scarecrows, Punch and Judy figures or axes, to induce terror. Whenever matters are at their most fraught, we’ll hear the deceptivel­y reassuring sound of country song “You are my sunshine” on the ancient record player. The film is very democratic in its bloodletti­ng. There is no compunctio­n about killing off even the most major characters.

is a prequel. A little confusingl­y, at the end of the story, we are suddenly whisked forward to Charles Manson-era Los Angeles (the setting of the original film).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India