The Sunday Guardian

Persecutio­n of Nat families under a flawed legal system

The absurd anti-begging laws in India are among the more disgracefu­l legacies of the British Empire, victimisin­g the poorest of the poor and leaving members of the Nat community in severely dire straits.

- MADHU KISHWAR

In the previous two parts of this series, I described how the children of our traditiona­l art performing communitie­s, namely Nats, are forcibly taken away by the police in collaborat­ion with NGOs claiming to work for child rights while adults are locked up in jail on charges of beggary and using child labour. In Part III of this series, I would like to describe the venality and absurdity of the laws against beggary and child labour. owning any material assets or even accumulati­ng food, are condemned and damned as legal offenders. Under this law, if Mahatma Buddha himself descended into 20th century India, he would have been locked up in jail. This law showed callous disregard for the millennia-old faith traditions of India, typical of the brown-sahib mentality of the Nehruvian elite.

“Having no visible means of subsistenc­e and wandering about or remaining in a public place in such condition or manner, as it makes it likely that the person doing so exists by receiving or soliciting alms.”

This criminalis­es poverty, which in most cases has been a direct result of misguided government policies. The India of 1950s was still wretchedly poor. Criminalis­ing poverty in a country whose economy had been brutally wrecked by 200 years of colonial rule, pushing vast sections of our peasantry, as well as traditiona­l artisans into destitutio­n and penury, was truly bizarre. And yet such a culturally insensitiv­e and anti-poor law was enacted in the heyday of Nehruvian socialism. Children of Manganiyar­s, Kalbelias, Mirasis etc. have often outshone in talent shows on television, so readers will have an idea of the potential that lies among them. children of the poor forcibly put in orphanages or protection homes are not allowed any contact with the outside world.

Releasing a child from these Homes requires soul-destroying amount of legal procedures, paper work, including producing identity papers, caste certificat­es from local sarpanch, NGO guarantors who will take responsibi­lity that the child will be educated. The process can take weeks or months. Procuring these certificat­es requires several trips and bribes. The child is not released in the city or town from he/she was taken into custody but in the native home town or village. This also involves a great deal of additional expense. Those who don’t have identity papers, have no escape.

The Natnis locked up in Nari Niketans are subjected to abusive behaviour, treated like prostitute­s, and often sexually exploited. The release of a sentenced adult on bail involves a minimum expense of Rs 10,000 by way of legal costs, bribes and another Rs 10-15,000 for getting a child out of “Protection Homes”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India