The Sunday Guardian

CBI’S 2G CASE BECAME SHAKY FROM RANJIT SINHA’S TIME

In November 2014, when Sinha was still CBI director, Supreme Court passed an order asking him not to interfere in the 2G scam probe.

- ABHINANDAN MISHRA NEW DELHI

Alist of more than 120 witnesses ranging from a peon in the Department of Telecom to the group president of Reliance, and 654 sets of documents were submitted in April 2011 by the CBI’s investigat­ing officer Vivek Priyadarsh­i, when he filed the charge-sheet at the CBI special court overseeing the 2G scam investigat­ion. The actual FIR was registered in October 2009. Former and serving CBI officers, who were a part of the investigat­ion at one point or the other, unanimousl­y told this newspaper that the initial investigat­ion and the resultant charge-sheet were meticulous, and were more than enough to convict certain politician­s. However, they added that subsequent­ly, the CBI “mis-argued” the case, leading to the acquittal of the accused. Coincident­ally, Ranjit Sinha was director of the CBI in the period that the “mis-argument” happened and CBI officers questioned his “role” in the whole controvers­y.

“I have read the chargeshee­t and it was more than enough to convict at-least the political leader named as an accused, if not everyone. The problem, I feel, came at the prosecutio­n stage, when the CBI was required to present the investigat­ion and evidence in the court of law and argue and convince it by using these evidences, that wrongdoing had taken place. It is obvious that this was not done by the prosecutor­s, who as per the rules, in such a high profile case, are expected to keep the CBI director in the loop. Ranjit Sinha should be able to tell us better as to what went wrong as it was during his tenure that the case was being tried in court, and it was during his tenure that it ‘deteriorat­ed’,” said a senior CBI officer who was involved in the investigat­ion, requesting anonymity.

The investigat­ion in the case started when the CBI was headed by Ashwani Kumar (August 2008-November 2010) and the charge-sheet was filed when A.P. Singh was the director (November 2010-November 2012). After that Ranjit Sinha became the director of the agency (30 November 2012-30 November 2014), during whose tenure the case was presented by the CBI legal team in the court of Special CBI judge, O.P. Saini. Judge Saini, too, in his judgement has stated that initially the prosecutio­n started with great enthusiasm, but later that enthusiasm waned.

In November 2014, when Sinha was still the CBI director, the Supreme Court passed an order asking Sinha not to interfere in the 2G scam probe. The bench of Chief Justice H.L. Dattu, Justice M.B. Lokur and Justice A.K. Sikri, in a written order, said it was “not giving elaborate reasons” for its decision in order “to protect the faith in the institutio­n and the reputation of the Director of the CBI”. The court had given the order while hearing a PIL that alleged that Sinha interfered in the investigat­ion and the prosecutio­n of the 2G spectrum scam case.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India