The Sunday Guardian

One size doesn’t fit all

-

The Supreme Court is showing commendabl­e concern for the health of the air that Indians breathe, and its recent order that the bursting of firecracke­rs be restricted to two hours not just on Diwali, but during all festivitie­s across the country—between 8 pm and 10 pm—has to be seen in this context. The Court has been so meticulous that it has allotted even a separate slot, that of 11.55 pm to 12.30 am, for bursting firecracke­rs during Christmas and New Year’s Eve celebratio­ns. But then as it happens with all such orders that try to standardis­e customs and practices, this order too has been greeted with a great degree of dismay by the general public. This is something that was certainly not the Supreme Court’s intention. South of the Vindhyas, Diwali is celebrated in the morning, just as weddings are in many parts of the country. So complaints regarding this are being voiced by those affected. There is also unhappines­s among many who wait the whole year to burst fire-crackers on Diwali, not just for reasons of faith but also to celebrate the festival of lights, or to worship Goddess Kali, particular­ly in the eastern parts of the country. Worse, coming so soon after the forward-looking verdict permitting the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple, the firecracke­r order is being interprete­d as an unwelcome intrusion into the majority community’s beliefs and faith. Such a charge is completely false, apart from being unfair, and would leave the Supreme Court justices shocked, as public good and fairness are the only motivators that drive India’s courts. In fact, after last year’s blanket ban on the sale of firecracke­rs in Delhi-NCR caused major resentment among the public, this year the judges did not tread down the same path and instead introduced time restrictio­ns, asked the state government­s to demarcate designated areas for community bursting of firecracke­rs, apart from allowing the sale of “green crackers” in Delhi-NCR. The problem, of course, is of enforcing the order. India’s law enforcemen­t agencies are in no way equipped to ensure that the court orders are implemente­d, especially in a situation where the majority of households in this billion-plus country will burst firecracke­rs in nearly every nook and cranny of this vast landmass. No law enforcemen­t agency can possibly police every lane and bylane of this country’s cities and villages. In fact, that is not even desirable, because India is not a police state. However well-intentione­d the judges may have been, a court-mandated ban cannot work unless the urge to desist from pursuing the banned activity comes from within the public. For that to happen, not only is education needed, but also alternativ­e and affordable replacemen­ts. The use of plastic bags may have been banned by the courts in certain parts of the country, but these bags continue be used for reasons of convenienc­e and for lack of economic alternativ­es. Green crackers may have been permitted to be sold in Delhi-NCR, but neither firecracke­r sellers nor law and order enforcers know what environmen­t friendly crackers are. This sector is largely unorganise­d, with fly by night operators often catering to the huge demand during Diwali. Chances are, overnight, crackers will be labelled green and sold openly in markets by unscrupulo­us traders to escape the police dragnet. This will make a mockery of the purpose for which the court order has been given.

Also, restrictio­ns on the bursting of firecracke­rs on the day of Diwali, and during other festivitie­s, will not clean the environmen­t. Such days are too few and far between for these curbs to have any positive impact on the air quality of heavily polluted cities. All that such restrictio­ns will do is dampen the festive spirit, which is not desirable. If the air in Delhi-NCR is polluted, it is not because of firecracke­rs, but because of the “fire chambers” created by crop burning in the neighbouri­ng states in October-November. The presence of particulat­e matters reaches dangerous levels in Delhi-NCR not because of sparklers and fire bombs, but because of the predominan­ce of constructi­on dust in this region’s air. In fact, loose dust next to even well paved roads contribute­s to Delhi-NCR’s air pollution in a major way, as do the use of kerosene, wood and charcoal stoves for purposes of cooking. Cleaning the air has to be a year-round activity, so as to ensure that the wanton bursting of firecracke­rs on one day of the year does not push the polluted cities towards the point of no return. Moreover, not all human habitats in this country are equally polluted to merit such stringent restrictio­ns on the bursting of firecracke­rs. It cannot be a case of “one size fits all”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India