The Sunday Guardian

‘Headless’ CBI gives TMC a breather in scam cases

-

The Central Bureau of Investigat­ion’s (CBI) investigat­ion into the high-profile Narada, Sarada and Rose Valley scams involving top Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders, has been put on the back-burner due to the lack of any direction and supervisio­n from the top.

In June, then CBI Special Director Rakesh Asthana had visited Kolkata and, after witnessing the officials “going slow” on the probe, had ordered them to file a charge-sheet in the case by 15 November and keep sending a report to the headquarte­rs on the status of the investigat­ion on a fortnightl­y basis. With the self-imposed deadline getting over, the agency is still “quite far” from presenting anything concrete in the matter, CBI sources stated. This has come as a major relief for the Mamata Banerjeele­d government, which was looking at imminent arrest of some of its top leaders in November. According to agency sources, with the present caretaker director of the agency, M. Nageswara Rao having limited power to take a call on any major policy decision, the future of these scams will now be decided once a new full-fledged director is appointed after the tenure of the incumbent A.K. Verma gets over in January.

“This is a very sensitive case and it needs to be dealt with all the top brass of the agency being on the same page. Imagine, if the CBI files a charge-sheet today implicatin­g these leaders, and the next day a DIG-rank officer files an applicatio­n in the court that the CBI filed the charge-sheet under the supervisio­n of officials in the PMO, what would happen then?” the sources asked. “Otherwise also, the CBI’s credibilit­y is very low right now. When the agency is almost headless, no action should be expected from CBI in the cases involving these leaders,” an official source said.

After the internecin­e war broke out in the agency, Banerjee withdrew the West Bengal government’s “general consent”, which empowers it to file a case or hold a probe in a state, and declared that the CBI could not conduct raids or carry out investigat­ions in her state without her permission. As per rules governing CBI’s conduct, it has complete jurisdicti­on over Delhi, but can enter other states only with “general consent” of the respective government­s. The West Bengal government had in 1989 given the CBI a general consent order to this effect. The CBI had filed an FIR against 12 TMC leaders in the Narada case in April 2017. It had taken up the case on orders of the Calcutta High Court. With the general elections near, officials said it was unlikely that the Centre would move against Banerjee and her party leaders post January (assuming a new CBI chief is appointed by then), as it would lead to allegation­s that the BJP was using CBI to target political opponents. Security agencies have been asked to go into details of the illegal “phone-tapping” saga that had been unleashed during the internal feud between senior IPS officers and CBI colleagues Alok Verma and Rakesh Asthana.

Sources told The Sunday Guardian that mobile and landline phones of CBI officials, top officials from other organisati­ons and private individual­s, including political entities, were “evidently” tapped at the behest of both the groups, led by Verma and Asthana, by the CBI officials without taking permission from the Home Secretary.

“The calls of officials and individual­s, belonging to the two different ‘groups’, were being tapped and none of the two can claim innocence. It is true that the required permis-

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India