The Sunday Guardian

‘Obamacare is unconstitu­tional’

- REUTERS

TEXAS: A federal judge in Texas on Friday ruled the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, was unconstitu­tional based on its mandate requiring that people buy health insurance, a decision in a case that could reach the US Supreme Court.

US District Judge Reed O’Connor in Fort Worth agreed with a coalition of 20 states that a change in tax law last year eliminatin­g a penalty for not having health insurance invalidate­d the entire Obamacare law.

The coalition of states challengin­g the law was led by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel, both Republican­s.

Republican­s have opposed the 2010 law—the signature domestic policy achievemen­t of Republican President Donald Trump’s Democratic predecesso­r Barack Obama - since its inception and have repeatedly tried and failed to repeal it.

O’Connor ruled that under the logic of the landmark 2012 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the law, the individual mandate, which required that most Americans obtain health insurance or pay a tax, is now unconstitu­tional. In the 2012 ruling, a majority of the justices concluded that the individual mandate unconstitu­tionally imposed a requiremen­t that Americans buy insurance. However, a different majority held the mandate amounted to a constituti­onal tax penalty.

On Friday, O’Connor ruled that after Trump signed a $ 1.5 trillion tax bill passed by Congress last year that eliminated the penalties, the individual mandate could no longer be considered constituti­onal. He said because the individual mandate was an “essential” part of Obamacare, the entire law, rather than just the individual mandate, was unconstitu­tional.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India