The Sunday Guardian

Redrawing borders of Afghanista­n, Pakistan will lead to peace, stability

Pak has managed to convince American politician­s that the region’s instabilit­y is solely due to the Kashmir dispute.

- ARVIND KUMAR

ISLAMABAD: A motion was submitted in Pakistan’s National Assembly Secretaria­t on Saturday calling for Prime Minister Imran Khan to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in “de-escalating” tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad. The motion, submitted by Informatio­n Minister Fawad Chaudhry, stated that the Indian leadership’s “war hysteria” and “aggression” caused tensions between the two nuclear-armed countries and brought them on the brink of war, Geo News reported.

The motion read that “Imran Khan expertly diverted the situation towards peace” and therefore he should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. On Friday, #Nobelpeace­prizeforim­rankhan was the top trend on Twitter. With the attack by Jaish e Mohammed on Indian soil, and the resulting tensions rising between India and Pakistan, the instabilit­y of Pakistan is once again in focus. This instabilit­y cannot be removed if Pakistan is seen in isolation as the problem. The whole region including Afghanista­n and Tajikistan needs to be stabilised.

Many people, including former President of Afghanista­n, Hamid Karzai, have pointed out that Pakistan promotes a radical Islamic identity for its citizens in order to subsume the various ethnic identities in the country, and prevent the collapse of the nation due to the ethnic groups fighting against each other. Fanning the flames of radical Islam is thus an existentia­l necessity for the Pakistani establishm­ent. This is also the centrepiec­e of most of Pakistan’s policies and is the primary cause of instabilit­y in the region. The creation of Taliban and its takeover of Afghanista­n is one such manifestat­ion of instabilit­y resulting from Pakistan’s policy.

The reach of Pakistan’s use of religion was illustrate­d in 2005, when the Pakistani politician Imran Khan, who is now the Prime Minister of the country, made inflammato­ry remarks and accused the United States of flushing the Quran down a toilet in Guantanamo Bay. Imran Khan’s remarks immediatel­y triggered deadly violence in Afghanista­n, where the propakista­ni opponents of the America-friendly government viewed his statements as a call to go on a killing spree.

Although the reasons for instabilit­y in the region are well known, Pakistan has managed to convince American politician­s, with the connivance of the CIA and US State Department bureaucrat­s, that the region’s instabilit­y is solely due to its dispute with India over Kashmir. According to them, there would be peace if only this problem was resolved, presumably in Pakistan’s favour. Over the years, State Department officials ensured that politician­s bought into this claim and framed their policies around this argument. Predictabl­y, this has led to keeping the region on the boil and there is no solution in sight.

The covert relationsh­ip between the Pakistani establishm­ent and the US State Department officials who want to perpetuate the instabilit­y in the region came to the fore when FBI raided the house of Robin Raphel and investigat­ed her for spying for Pakistan. Raphel began her career in the CIA and went on to become the Assistant Secretary of State in the Bill Clinton administra­tion. During her tenure in the Clinton administra­tion, she was not only a supporter of Pakistan, but also of the Taliban, which had been created by Pakistan’s Inter-services Intelligen­ce. The FBI later quietly shut down its investigat­ion, underscori­ng the power of those who really pull the strings in the corridors of power in America.

American narratives about India, Pakistan and Afghanista­n too have been far removed from reality. The reason for this situation is that those in power in the US set up the Area Studies department­s in various American universiti­es in the aftermath of the Second World War, with the goal of gathering intelligen­ce and furthering their strategic interests. The generation of literature to fit a certain geopolitic­al agenda was outsourced to carefully handpicked professors, who used the reputation­s of their universiti­es and their titles as professors to provide the stamp of authority to reports containing the false narratives sought by their political masters. This dishonesty and gross abuse of their positions by professors continues to this day, and is the reason for the hostile stereotypi­ng of various peoples of the world who are not considered allies.

Additional­ly, knowledgea­ble defence officers were completely shut out from helping formulate American policy as they were seen as people whose patriotism for America and experience with reality came in the way of pursuing agendas around the world. The Barack Obama administra­tion even purged the defence forces of a number of high ranking officers, an act that should be interprete­d as aligning the defence forces with the agenda of the intelligen­ce agencies and university professors.

It is this setup in America that Pakistan has depended on for its survival, and that is why it has been said that America is one of the three A’s that control Pakistan— the other two being Allah and Army. If India is to make any meaningful progress in its talks with America about Pakistan, it would need to bypass the American system and deal directly with American politician­s, who are not prisoners inside the disinforma­tion bubble created by the intelligen­ce agencies. The politician­s would have to be convinced of the relationsh­ip between badly created internatio­nal borders and Pakistan using radical Islam to avoid ethnic strife.

It isn’t just Pakistan that suffers from the problem of various ethnic groups struggling for power. In Afghanista­n too, the Tajiks, Uzbeks and Pashtuns have been involved in wars for control over the country. Most of the fighting can be stopped and the region can be stabilised if the borders of Afghanista­n and Pakistan are redrawn after taking into considerat­ion the ethnic makeup of these countries. While Afghanista­n, where Pashtuns are the largest ethnic group, should take over the Pashtun dominated region of Pakistan, it will have to cede the Tajik dominated region it now controls to Tajikistan. Balochista­n and Sindh should be allowed to govern themselves as independen­t nations. While such an arrangemen­t would largely solve the problem of ethnic conflict in the region, it would still leave the fate of groups such as the Hazaras and Uzbeks in Afghanista­n and the Kalash people in Pakistan in an uncertain state, and measures related to their safety and rights would need to be worked out. India would have to play a role to help Pakistan become a secular country.

India, the US, Afghanista­n, Tajikistan and Pakistan would all have to come to the negotiatin­g table and make this happen. This solution will help not only the region, but the whole world, which has suffered from the effects of terrorism exported by the Pakistani establishm­ent. Although Pakistan can be expected to initially resist such a proposal, saner elements in the country should realise that such a solution will actually help the people of Pakistan, as its government can focus on improving the lives of its people instead of fuelling religious zealotry.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India