The Sunday Guardian

Surface cleaners with antibacter­ial agents put to a quality-assessment test

A Delhi-based consumer-interest organisati­on tested eight surface cleaners, in the price range of Rs 8.70-17.8 per 100ml, on parameters such as QAC content and ph levels. Here are the key findings and a roundup of the lab reports.

- SRI RAM KHANNA

Traditiona­lly, phenol was used for cleaning surfaces and disinfecti­ng toilets and kitchens. Popular usage has shifted to using newer chemical formluatio­ns. These days disinfecta­nt products using quaternary ammonium compounds (QACS) as the active ingredient are most extensivel­y used for cleaning of surfaces at homes and offices. They are frequently used for cleaning hard surfaces such as floors, laminated table tops, kitchen table tops and cabinets. While removal of dirt and stain is what is expected of these products, today we have various brands claiming to contain antibacter­ial /disinfecti­ng agents, otherwise known as QACS. The advantages of QACS are good stability and toxicology, surface activity and compatibil­ity with cleaner formulatio­n ingredient­s, and lack of odour. These properties make it well suited for consumer products that combine cleaning with disinfecti­on. Six of the eight popular brands sold at retail are based on QACS. These six include: Lizol, Clean Mate, Vow, Patanjali, Presto and Mopz. These six brands are sold at a price that varies from a low of Rs 8.70/100ml for Mopz(having offer of one extra bottle of 500 ml) to a high of Rs 17.8) for Lizol and Vow. The other brand Mr. Muscle (Rs 14.20/100ml) has non-ionic surfactant and benzalkoni­um chloride as active ingredient­s. While Unilever’s CIF has sodium salt of benzene sulphonic acid as the active ingredient and is the most expensive at Rs 39.60 in the market today.

These improvised products not only clean the surface superficia­lly but also reduce the bio-burden (harmful bacteria) and help to keep the environmen­t clean due to the effect of the antibacter­ial agents. Without getting caught up in the technicali­ties, Consumer Voice tested eight brands to find out some important things about the brands that claim to do the job more effectivel­y. These eight brands were tested on attributes that determine their efficacy. Each attribute was given score and brands collected scores out of 100 after adding on each criteria test score. The main question was answered by awarding highest score out of 100 for each brand: Do these brands fulfill the basic requiremen­ts specified in the national standard?

Test criteria

Consumer voice bought these samples at retail and compared the eight brands on quality and acceptabil­ity parameters during testing in a lab. The test criteria included quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) content, cleaning properties, ph level, stability, non-volatile matter, odour and colour. Of the eight brands, six are Qac-based. The samples were tested as per specificat­ions in Indian Standard 14364: 1996 (reaffirmed in 2013) related to quaternary ammonium compound-based

Key Findings

• •

• • • Based on the overall test findings, Lizol and Clean Mate are the top performers and are followed by Vow and Patanjali.

The value-for-money brand is Patanjali.

All brands passed in tests for cleaning properties and stability.

QAC content in all the Qac-based brands met the minimum requiremen­t specified in the Indian Standard. All Qac-based brands met all requiremen­ts specified in the standard except in the case of ph.

Mr. Muscle met the specified limit for ph.

surface cleaners. Consumer Voice followed the standard test methods at an Nabl-accredited laboratory.

Lizol and Clean Mate each got the highest score of 91 out of 100 based on the testing. They were both adjudged as the top performers. Vow and Patanjali scored 90 out of 100 each stood at 2nd place. Patanjali was adjudged as “Value for Money” brand as its retail price is Rs 12.50 which is Rs 5.30 cheaper as compared to the top performer Lizol. Presto with

88/100 stood at third place followed by Mopz at 84/100. Mr. Muscle and CIF were not compared as they were strictly not comparable due to their difference in chemical compositio­n.

QAC content

QAC content in surface cleaner should be a minimum 0.40% as per standard.

Cleaning properties

The material, when applied either neat or diluted with water by means of a clean lint-free cloth or a cotton mop, will clean as described in the Indian Standard.

Non-volatile matter

Determinat­ion of non-volatile matter or residue is an important qualitativ­e test for products in which the presence of any residue may affect product quality and performanc­e, or process efficiency. WHAT THE BRANDS CLAIM? Brand Lizol Clean Mate Vow Patanjali Presto Mopz CIF Mr. Muscle

Stability ph Value

Claims

Removes 100 stains and germ strains, kills 99.9% germs

Kills up to 99.9% germs, effective stain cleaner, safe on hands

Kills 99.9% germs, cleans tough stains Kills germs, hypochlori­te-free disinfecta­nt

Kills 99.9% germs, safe on hands, removes stains

Effective germ kill, long-lasting shine Tough cleaning, minimum effort Kills 99.9% germs

Non-volatile matter is the soluble, suspended, or particulat­e material remaining following evaporatio­n of the volatile solvent that contains the material. For surface cleaners, this should be a minimum four per cent as per Indian Standard. This parameter shows if the product will remain effective during its life period. The ph scale goes from 0 to 14, 7 being considered neutral. Anything below 7 is considered acidic and anything above 7 is considered

Odour

Uses Floor, kitchen and bathroom surfaces Kitchen and bathroom surfaces Floor, kitchen and bathroom surfaces Floor, kitchen and bathroom Floor, kitchen and bathroom Floor, kitchen and bathroom surfaces Kitchen, bathroom and around the house Floor tiles, kitchen sink These claims were tested on individual test parameters used in the lab scores.

alkaline. The ph value of a surface cleaner should be between 5 and 7. When chemicals are dissolved in water, the mixture’s ph level can become either acidic or alkaline. Alkaline solutions are better at cutting through dirt, grease, proteins, oils and other organic items. Acids are better for removing calcium, rust and other minerals. The material should be odourless or with a pleasant fragrance. All tested brands had acceptable odour and pleasant fragrance.

Top performers Lizol and Clean mate had a Pine fragrance. Patanjali claimed a refreshing fragrance while Vow and Mr. Muscle claimed a floral fragrance while lime/ lemon fragrance was claimed by CIF and Mopz. Presto claimed a citrus fragrance.

Colour

The material should be colourless or with a suitable colour. The product, when applied for cleaning and subsequent wiping out with wet mop, should not leave any colouratio­n or stain on the floor or any other surface. On dilution with water as recommende­d, the colour should be faint to colourless.

 ??  ?? The eight brands were tested on attributes that determine their efficacy at an Nabl-accredited lab.
The eight brands were tested on attributes that determine their efficacy at an Nabl-accredited lab.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India