The Sunday Guardian

Future tech: Google claims a quantum breakthrou­gh

- CADE METZ

Google said Wednesday that it had achieved a longsought breakthrou­gh called “quantum supremacy,” which could allow new kinds of computers to do calculatio­ns at speeds that are inconceiva­ble with today’s technology.

The Silicon Valley giant’s research lab in Santa Barbara, California, reached a milestone that scientists had been working toward since the 1980s: Its quantum computer performed a task that isn’t possible with traditiona­l computers, according to a paper published in the science journal Nature.

A quantum machine could one day drive big advances in areas like artificial intelligen­ce and make even the most powerful supercompu­ters look like toys. The Google device did in 3 minutes 20 seconds a mathematic­al calculatio­n that supercompu­ters could not complete in under 10,000 years, the company said in its paper.

Scientists likened Google’s announceme­nt to the Wright brothers’ first plane flight in 1903 — proof that something is really possible even though it may be years before it can fulfill its potential.

“The original Wright flyer was not a useful airplane,” said Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the University of Texas at Austin who reviewed Google’s paper before publicatio­n. “But it was designed to prove a point. And it proved the point.”

Still, some researcher­s cautioned against getting too excited about Google’s achievemen­t since so much more work needs to be done before quantum computers can migrate out of the research lab. Right now, a single quantum machine costs millions of dollars to build.

Many of the tech industry’s biggest names, including Microsoft, Intel and IBM as well as Google, are jockeying for a position in quantum computing. And venture capitalist­s have invested more than $450 million into startups exploring the technology, according to a recent study.

China is spending $400 million on a national quantum lab and has filed almost twice as many quantum patents as the United States in recent years. The Trump administra­tion followed suit this year with its own National Quantum Initiative, promising to spend $1.2 billion on quantum research, including computers.

A quantum machine, the result of more than a century’s worth of research into a type of physics called quantum mechanics, operates in a completely different manner from regular computers. It relies on the mind-bending ways some objects act at the subatomic level or when exposed to extreme cold, like the metal chilled to nearly 460 degrees below zero inside Google’s machine.

One day, researcher­s believe, these devices could power advances in artificial intelligen­ce or easily overwhelm the encryption that protects computers vital to national security. Because of that, the government­s of the United States and China consider quantum computing a national security priority.

But first, scientists must prove such a machine can become more than a project that hints at what could eventually be possible.

Traditiona­l computers perform calculatio­ns by processing “bits” of informatio­n, with each bit holding either a 1 or a 0. That has been the case for decades.

Understand­ing how a quantum computer is different requires a philosophi­cal leap: accepting the notion that a single object can behave like two separate objects at the same time when it is either extremely small or extremely cold.

By harnessing that odd behavior, scientists can instead build a quantum bit, or qubit, which stores a combinatio­n of 1 and 0. Two qubits can hold four values at once. And as the number of qubits grows, a quantum computer becomes exponentia­lly more powerful.

Scientists first described the idea in the 1980s, but qubits are fragile. Stringing even a few together can involve years of work. For the past several decades, labs in academia, industry and government have worked on quantum computing through a wide variety of techniques, including systems built around particles of light or electromag­netic fields that trap tiny charged particles.

About 20 years ago, researcher­s in Japan pioneered “supercondu­cting qubits,” for which certain metals are chilled to extremely low temperatur­es.

This method has shown particular promise, sparking projects at IBM, Google and Intel. Their machines look nothing like a regular computer. They are large cylinders of metal and twisted wires that are dropped into stainless steel refrigerat­ors. You send informatio­n to the machine, as you would to a traditiona­l computer chip, and receive calculatio­ns in return.

“We have built a new kind of computer based on some of the unusual capabiliti­es of quantum mechanics,” said John Martinis, who oversaw the team that managed the hardware for Google’s quantum supremacy experiment. Noting the computatio­nal power, he added, “We are now at the stage of trying to make use of that power.”

Google’s paper became a bit of an internet mystery after it was published and then quickly unpublishe­d online in late September. That brief appearance was enough to raise the hackles of researcher­s at competing companies who believe the Silicon Valley giant is inflating its accomplish­ment.

On Monday, IBM fired a preemptive shot with a blog post disputing Google’s claim that its quantum calculatio­n could not be performed by a traditiona­l computer. The calculatio­n, IBM argued, could theoretica­lly be run on a current computer in less than two and a half days — not 10,000 years.

“This is not about final and absolute dominance over classical computers,” said Dario Gil, who heads the IBM research lab in Yorktown Heights, New York, where the company is building its own quantum computers.

Other researcher­s dismissed the milestone because the calculatio­n was notably esoteric. It generated random numbers using a quantum experiment that can’t necessaril­y be applied to other things.

Though IBM disputed that Google had really accomplish­ed all that much, Gil argued that quantum computers were indeed getting closer to reality. “By 2020, we will be able to use them for commercial and scientific advantage,” he said.

© 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES

By harnessing that odd behavior, scientists can instead build a quantum bit, or qubit, which stores a combinatio­n of 1 and 0. Two qubits can hold four values at once.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India