The Sunday Guardian

Lucy Barton review: Laura Linney finds her perfect match

- BEN BRANTLEY

The title character of My Name Is Lucy Barton, Rona Munro’s crystallin­e stage adaptation of Elizabeth Strout’s 2016 novel, is hardly a woman of mystery. On the contrary, as embodied with middle-american forthright­ness by a perfectly cast Laura Linney, in the production that opened Wednesday at the Samuel J. Friedman Theater, Lucy may be the most translucen­t figure now on a New York stage.

Feelings seem to register on her face before her thoughts have a chance to catch up with them, so that we know when she’s hurting or happy almost before she does. A New York writer who grew up in rural Illinois, Lucy Barton is surely someone we can trust to speak plain. What a relief to be in the company, for once, of a thoroughly reliable narrator.

And yet mystery—truly unfathomab­le and utterly ordinary—is at the center of this deceptivel­y modest Manhattan Theater Club production, which originated in London and is directed with quiet care by Richard Eyre. I’m not referring to the classic suspense-making withholdin­g of informatio­n that is usually a requisite of entertaini­ng storytelli­ng.

Nor do I mean those moments in which Lucy, recalling a loveless childhood in poverty on an isolated farm, slams on the brakes of her narrative as she stumbles on a memory she would rather not talk about now. Give her time; she’ll come back to it.

But Lucy also knows that full transparen­cy does not equal full knowledge. This is true even when your primary sources are your own heart and mind.

“I still am not sure it’s a true memory,” Lucy says, after describing the sadistic public humiliatio­n of her brother by her father on the streets of a small town. “Except I do know it, I think. I mean: It is true …” That final affirmatio­n rings slightly hollow.

Because of course we can’t know the full truth of any person, including our own self. That’s part of what makes life so sad; it is an even larger part of what makes life such so wondrously fascinatin­g. Every breath of Linney’s performanc­e acknowledg­es this contradict­ion.

As a storytelle­r, Strout’s Lucy is almost apologetic in her humility. But she is also possessed of an underlying strength that knows that she has had what it takes to not only endure but prevail.

The setting of the play is largely a hospital room, evoked in Bob Crowley’s set by little more than an institutio­nal chair and bed, with transforma­tive lighting by Peter Mumford. (Video design by Luke Halls, which turns the hospital window into an aperture onto a hazy past, is fine, though I could have done without the intrusive melancholy music.)

This is where many years ago, a younger Lucy spent nearly nine weeks of her existence, with a life-threatenin­g infection that is never fully identified. Her hospitaliz­ation reunites her with the mother she hasn’t seen in years.

In the scenes that follow, Lucy often becomes her mother— or rather Linney becomes Lucy becoming her mother. This is an important distinctio­n to make, since Linney is not trying to create another, autonomous character here.

When Lucy speaks as her mother, it’s with a sort of descriptiv­e physical shorthand, conjuring sharp edges and a nasal twang. The caricature in the imitation underscore­s the distance between what Lucy came from and what she has become. But now, in extremis, all Lucy wants is Mommy, and she wants Mommy to tell her stories.

And though she begins reluctantl­y, Lucy’s mother turns out to be a corn country Scheheraza­de, with successive stories of local women who aspired above their station and usually came to bad ends. They are familiar tales and yet utterly distinctiv­e from one another, with startling details that suggest the perversity of flailing souls who misread their own intentions.

“People,” Lucy says, wonderingl­y, after her mother finishes an anecdote about a runaway wife. Her mother echoes, “People.” It’s a gorgeous moment of fleeting complicity between mother and daughter.

As for subjects closer to their Amgash, Illinois, home, especially Lucy’s tormented father, her mother sidesteps those with discomfort and disapprova­l. It is for her daughter to fill in those gaps for us, with accounts of the kind of numbing, oppressive and outright abusive existence that so many people accept as a life sentence.

Lucy did not, though. Why? Her trajectory from childhood to college, to marriage and motherhood, and ultimately to a career as a successful fiction writer, is fairly convention­al in summary. It sounds like one of those inspiratio­nal survivor stories, of success against the odds, which are regularly packaged for mass consumptio­n.

But Lucy conveys an abiding air of surprise that all this happened to her. Linney’s presence here is deferentia­l, almost shy. From the moment she enters, walking quickly and talking briskly, you sense that it requires conscious, self-preaching willpower for her to tell us all this.

But when Lucy says she has become ruthless—as those who first knew she wanted to be a writer advised her she would have to be—we believe her. This means that the truths she is telling hurt—us and her. And they of course aren’t the whole truth.

But aren’t we grateful for the alchemical, unquantifi­able mix of factors that allows this woman—embodied by this actress, at this moment, in this place—to share with us so raptly what she knows, or even thinks she knows? When Lucy says, with a satisfacti­on that’s bigger than happiness, that “all life amazes me,” we feel exactly what she means.

© 2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES

As a storytelle­r, Strout’s Lucy is almost apologetic in her humility. But she is also possessed of an underlying strength that knows that she has had what it takes to not only endure but prevail.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India