The Sunday Guardian

How China sees the Taliban

One Chinese scholar says that the US withdrawal has ‘provided the Afghan people with an important opportunit­y to become the masters of their own country’.

- B.R. DEEPAK

While talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban have hit a dead end, the Taliban have been enjoying hospitalit­y from Russia, Iran and China, thus legitimisi­ng the once deadly terrorist organisati­on. The Taliban’s chief negotiator, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar was hosted in Tianjin on 28 July 2021 by none other than China’s Foreign Minister and State Councillor, Wang Yi, just two days after the US Deputy Secretary of State, Wendy Sherman was hosted at the same venue. Though it is obvious that the Taliban is exploiting China’s troubled relationsh­ip with the US, however, China too wishes to secure its interests in the Afpak region as the Taliban is poised to take over Afghanista­n after the US withdrawal. The has upheld that hosting the Taliban is consistent with China’s advocacy for “Afghanista­nled and Afghan-owned”

peace process. Wang Yi, during his meeting with the Taliban in Tianjin pronounced them as “a very decisive military and political force in Afghanista­n”, which is “expected to play an important role in the country’s peace, reconcilia­tion and reconstruc­tion process”. So why is China hosting the terror organisati­on?

One, Chinese scholars believe that the hurried and “irresponsi­ble withdrawal”

of the US from Afghanista­n shows that the US and its allies have lost the two-decadelong war it initiated in Afghanista­n. director of the Asia-pacific Institute of the China Institute of Internatio­nal Studies, posits that “the US has completely abandoned the Afghan people, leaving only devastatio­n and endless misery”. Conversely, China has played the role of a “responsibl­e major power and an important neighbour of Afghanista­n, which has always adhered to non-interferen­ce in Afghanista­n’s internal affairs,” and has been actively mediating between different political factions in Afghanista­n, so as to strengthen and promote dialogue and contribute to the Afghan peace and reconcilia­tion process. Wang Yi’s meeting with the Taliban has been stated by Lan as an outcome of China taking stock of the situation

strengthen­ing contacts with the Afghan government, the Afghan Taliban, and closely coordinati­ng policy with neighbouri­ng countries such as Pakistan, Iran, and Central Asian republics. The Taliban, on their part, have appreciate­d “China’s fair and active role in the peace process” and pronounced China as a “trustworth­y and good friend of the Afghan people”. Lan, also says that the US withdrawal has “provided the Afghan people with an important opportunit­y to become the masters of their own country”.

Two, it is owing to mutual security concerns that China hosted the Taliban. an analyst argues that the Taliban are lobbying for support of the neighbouri­ng countries so as their prospectiv­e regime survives in Kabul. In other words, they want to “seek security”

from China, one of the most powerful neighbours of Afghanista­n. In turn, China has also sought security for its restive Xinjiang and secured a guarantee from the Afghan Taliban that they “will never allow forces to use Afghan territory to threaten China’s security”. Obviously, China has the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) in mind, which in tandem with the Taliban and foreign fighters has been operating in the Badakhshan region of the Wakhan corridor since 2016. Chinese media

that in July 2020, they also participat­ed in the Taliban’s attacks on mining areas and towns near the Pakistani border. A recent bus attack in

Pakistan in which 9 Chinese engineers were killed has also been attributed to the Tehreek-e-taliban Pakistan (TTP) and ETIM rebels. In tandem with Pakistan, China has urged the Afghan Taliban to make a clean break from various terror outfits including the TTP and the ETIM. Wang Yi urged the Afghan Taliban to “hold high the banner of peace talks, set up peace goals, build a positive image and pursue an inclusive policy

even as the Afghan Taliban continue to perpetrate atrocities amounting to war crimes in the areas controlled by them or where they are advancing.

Three, the importance of the Wakhan Corridor since 2015 has been replaced by the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the flagship of Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the project of the century. China has committed to invest over US$70 billion in this corridor and desires to extend the same to Afghanista­n. China building a road through Wakhan Corridor that will link Xinjiang to Afghanista­n, and a road connecting Peshawar-kabuldusha­nbe should be seen in this context. Once complete, the AF-PAK region and Central Asia will get connected to Xinjiang, and enable China to expand its investment in mining, energy and transport infrastruc­ture on the one hand and export its products to the region on the other. No wonder, the Taliban promised to protect Chinese investment in Afghanista­n during their meeting with Wang Yi. Owing to security concerns, China has been cautious to invest in Afghanista­n. Its total investment in Afghanista­n remains less than half a billion dollars. The promised investment of US$3 billion in the Mes Aynak copper mines has been stalled since the deal was signed in 2007. China has also secured a 25year US$400 million bid to drill oil in Afghanista­n.

Finally, as far as India is concerned, professor at the Institute of Internatio­nal Studies, Fudan University argues that since the US is unwilling to consign its “achievemen­ts” of decades in Afghanista­n to flames, it has been actively seeking India to stand up and “take over” Since India has long stood on the opposite side of the Taliban in Afghanista­n, it is unwilling to see the Taliban regain power. This, according to Lin, has formed the strategic basis of the Us-india cooperatio­n. He posits that the United States hopes for

India to play a greater role in giving air support to Afghan government forces, but it is still unclear what role India is willing to play. He asserts that even if the Afghan Taliban regain power, the two countries will not easily recognize their “legitimacy”. On the question of Pakistan’s apprehensi­ons, scholars such as maintain that Pakistan’s policy towards Afghanista­n stems mainly from geopolitic­al and security considerat­ions. It strives to ensure the establishm­ent of a friendly or at least a neutral regime in Afghanista­n, to prevent the expansion of India’s influence and the continued tilt of the regional balance of power in favour of India, and to avoid having enemies on both its eastern and western flanks

eye on china

Considerin­g that ethnic groups such as the Tajik, Hazara, and the Uzbek maintain contacts with India to varying degrees, the Pashtuns can be described as Pakistan’s “worst choice”. In addition, Pakistan has also played an important role in the signing of a peace agreement between the United States and the Taliban. In future, whether the Taliban focus on consolidat­ing their political status in Afghanista­n or developing the economy after the formation of a government, they cannot do so without Pakistan’s support, asserts Professor Lin. Therefore, maintainin­g friendly relations with Pakistan will be the top priority of the Taliban’s regional policy.

B.R. Deepak is Professor, Center of Chinese and Southeast Asian Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

 ??  ?? PRC’S State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi met a Taliban delegation in Tianjin, China on 28 July.
PRC’S State Councillor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi met a Taliban delegation in Tianjin, China on 28 July.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India