Mothers are less wealthy than women without children
The direct and indirect costs of having children can be high and, in many societies, women most often shoulder these costs.
In a recent research study, we measured the gender-speci¿c economic impact of parenthood in Germany. Our ¿nding: mothers may end up with less accrued wealth than women without children, theconversation.com wrote.
German men, who are comparable in other characteristics such as education and age, on the other hand, show similar amounts of personal wealth regardless of whether they have children.
The research, which was conducted in Germany, looked at 28,650 individuals to assess women’s personal wealth over the course of a decade, from 2002 to 2012. For the purposes of our study, personal wealth refers to all economic assets that subjects own solely as well as their individual share of assets jointly owned with somebody else.
We found that each year after a woman’s ¿rst child is born, she accrues only about 98 cents for each €1 of wealth that childless women gain. This small difference adds up over time. After being a mother for 50 years, a mother’s personal wealth is roughly 60 percent lower than for a German woman who does not have children, everything else remaining equal.
This gap in capital is largely related to employment. German mothers accumulate less wealth because they are likely to stop paid work to care for their young children and, as children get older, return to work part-time.
Without full-time employment, women have less income to put into savings. Employment gaps may also reduce long-term earning potential because career advancement becomes less likely.
According to our study, the women’s husbands do not appear to fully compensate for these losses in wealth by sharing ¿nancial resources within the couple.
The loss in personal wealth is greater the younger a woman is when she becomes a mother. The difference may be due to the fact that career interruptions early in one’s working life are especially harmful.
By middle life (ages 40 to 60), The common stereotype has teens glued to their phones 24-7. But nearly 60 percent of teens in the US have actually taken a break from social media, the bulk of them even voluntarily, a new survey found.
The poll from The Associated PRESSNORC Center for Public Affairs Research of teens aged 13 to 17 found that most teens value the feeling of connection with friends and family that social media provides. A much smaller number associate it with negative emotions, such as being overwhelmed or needing to always show their best selves, usatoday.com wrote.
The survey found that teens’ social media breaks are typically a week or longer, and boys are more likely to take longer breaks.
Teens were allowed to cite multiple reasons for their breaks. Nearly twothirds of teens who took a break cited at least one voluntary reason. Amanda Lenhart, the lead researcher and an expert on young people and technology use, said she was surprised by this, as it counters the broader narrative that teens are ‘handcuffed’ to their social media pro¿les.
Today’s teenagers might not recall a time before social media. Myspace was founded in 2003. Had it survived, it would be 14 years old today. Facebook is a year younger. Instagram launched in 2010. For an adult to understand what it mothers and fathers show the greatest discrepancy in wealth. By older age, these inequalities decrease.
The reduced wealth of mothers as compared to fathers and to women without children has many important implications.
Financial assets and savings are resources that can be tapped to weather rainy days, independent of current income. Wealth can also be passed on to the next generation or invested in education and, thereby, affect the well-being of children.
For a woman living with a more wealthy husband, having little wealth may seem less important. But, as we know, couples do not always fully share their wealth.
And, in any case, inequalities in personal wealth within the same household also hurt women. German women reported lower subjective well-being if they had less wealth than their husbands, and studies from Ecuador and Ghana have shown that the risk of intimate husband violence increases when women’s personal capital is less than that of their husbands. Although we do not know whether those ¿ndings would apply in Germany or other countries.
Finally, economic inequality between mothers and fathers can affect children. When mothers have relatively more resources, the well-being of children is improved. If couples separate, gender inequalities within couples may ultimately contribute to inequalities between ex-couples.
Our research examined the wealth consequences of parenthood in Germany, where women have achieved equal status compared to men in many respects. Nonetheless, a traditional division of labor, where men are the main breadwinners, still dominates here.
Other research, though based on less adequate data, has also found a wealth gap between genders in the United States. Complementary evidence on income inequalities between mothers and fathers have additionally been found in many countries around the world, including China, Japan, Nigeria and the United Kingdom.
Gender-based wealth inequality as a result of parenthood may be weaker in more egalitarian societies, such as Sweden.
Wealth inequalities between mothers and fathers — and, more generally, between women and men, even within married couples — are stronger in countries in which women and men do not have equal legal status.
In Ghana, for example, where women’s contributions to marital assets are not recognized, married women own only about 20 percent of household assets. Similar inequality exists in some parts of India.
By contrast, in Ecuador, where women’s legal status is more equal to men’s, wealth inequalities within married couples are negligible.
* Philipp M. Lersch is a postdoctoral researcher in sociology, University of Cologne
disconnected from friends. Some said they need social media for school or extracurricular activities.
“I like to see what my friends and family are up to,” said Lukas Goodwin, 14, who uses Instagram and Snapchat every day. He said he took a break from Instagram ‘a few years ago’ but not recently. Now, he says, “I wouldn’t want to take a break from them.” Among the survey’s other ¿ndings: ● Lower income teens were more likely to take social media breaks than their wealthier counterparts, and their breaks tended to last longer. The study points out that educators who use social media in the classroom need to understand that not every teen is online and connected all the time.
● Boys were more likely to feel overloaded with information on social media, while girls were more likely to feel they always have to show the best version of themselves.
● Teens who took breaks typically did so across the board, checking out of Facebook, Snapchat and all other services all at once. And they were no more or less likely to take breaks from social media based on the type of services they use.
● Although they felt relief and were happy to be away from social media for a while, most teens said things went back to how they were before once they returned to social media.