Abortion needs open and balanced debate

NO MATTER what CDC Armstrong (Write Back, January 12) thinks, I am very pleased that my letter of January 10 has prompted the further exchange of views on the pro-choice/prolife debate.

I assure CDC Armstrong that I have no wish for a one-sided debate, only to ensure that there is no religious flag-waving.

While people are entitled to hold their own personal beliefs, these should not be paraded as main elements of a general argument.

I can see nothing illogical, inconsistent or dubious in my approach and, while I am neither pregnant nor female, I stand firmly with those women who wish to be allowed choice without criminalisation.

On the other hand, I find much to agree with in Fr Patrick McCafferty’s views, but I would take issue with his statement that “science proves that human life is present from the moment of conception”.

Science has demonstrated that the only significant difference between humans and other primates is their larger brain capacity that allows for the development of complex language and thought processes.

None of these characteristics are exhibited by a fertilised egg or an embryo/ early foetus.

I think that it is highly significant that the government in southern Ireland are preparing to tackle the thorny issue from which our own politicians largely shy away.

It is also significant that a suggestion of termination for all who wish it up to 12 weeks has been mentioned.

At that stage of development, there are no specifically human attributes present — only the potential coded for in DNA.

To conclude, I would reiterate my main point that a change in the law to allow women choice without criminalisation in no way forces anyone to avail themselves of the termination of pregnancy.

I hope to see a continuation of proper debate on this topic.

DAVID FULLERTON Belfast