Belfast Telegraph

Frictionle­ss border plans cannot be put in place in time for Brexit: MPs

- BY MICHAEL McHUGH

THE Government will not have time to introduce invisible customs arrangemen­ts on the border before Brexit, an influentia­l group of MPs has warned.

Withdrawal is due in just over a year and the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee said the UK may need to remain in or parallel to the customs union and single market throughout the two-year transition period.

Parliament­arians urged the Government to do more to clarify the rules, processes and technical measures that will allow the current frictionle­ss North/South arrangemen­ts to continue.

They said ministers should develop an innovative system capable of delivering customs compliance without “ineffectiv­e and unworkable” physical infrastruc­ture. The committee inquiry failed to find a technical solution capable of avoiding a hard border anywhere else in the world.

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson had suggested crossings could be monitored by technology, like travel between London boroughs.

Committee chairman Dr Andrew Murrison said: “It is now clear that a significan­t transition period is essential for the options in December’s Joint Report (EUUK) to be worked though.

“It is equally clear that regulatory and tariff alignment will be required during transition to avoid any hardening of the border before a definitive low-friction solution can be determined.”

The committee report, representi­ng Conservati­ves, the DUP and Labour, said the negotiatin­g timeline made it “challengin­g” to expect full implementa­tion of a new non-visible customs regime by March next year.

It added: “We have seen no evidence to suggest that, right now, an invisible border is possible.”

The committee heard “numerous” proposals for how the UK and the EU could ensure customs compliance without physical infrastruc­ture, including mobile patrols, data sharing and enforcemen­t measures away from the border.

“However, we have had no visibility of any technical solutions, anywhere in the world, beyond the aspiration­al, that would remove the need for physical infrastruc­ture at the border.

“We recommend the Government bring forward detailed proposals, without further delay, that set out how it will maintain an open and invisible border. These proposals should provide detail about how customs compliance will be enforced if there is regulatory and tariff divergence between the UK and Ireland.”

It said the Government should conduct an impact assessment for the Irish border each time regulatory or tariff divergence from the EU was proposed and said regulatory exemptions may be sought.

The report rejected any proposals for a customs border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

“This would create a costly barrier to trade with Northern Ireland’s largest market and would be incompatib­le with the spirit and intent of the Belfast/ Good Friday Agreement.”

It also found that leaving the EU without a substantia­l agreement would have very negative consequenc­es for avoiding a hard border.

And it said the Government should set out in detail how it proposes to manage immigratio­n through internal controls, including whether there will be increased documentar­y checks to determine entitlemen­t for residency and to access public services.

 ??  ?? The border, and (left) Dr Andrew Murrison
The border, and (left) Dr Andrew Murrison
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland