Best: moving is difficult when you are leaving boyhood club

CONTINUED FROM BACK

Best ( below) added: “For me moving from Ulster to Northampton proved even more intense. For a relatively small place, Northampton was supporting a first-rate old money English club and the level of fan and media attention was even more intense.

“But my advice to these guys would be to move to a bigger city where they can enjoy a greater degree of privacy which I am sure would be welcome after recent weeks and months.”

T here’ ll be challenges though, h e wa r n s , most notably the ever-dwindling prospect that they’ ll ever find themselves in a position to pull on either the Ulster or Ireland jersey again.

“Moving i s diffic ult, especially when you’re leaving your boyhood club and the one you probably only ever dreamed of playing for,” he added.

“That’s really tough. I think every exile harbours a hope, however small, that someday they’ ll return and pull on a jersey with a red hand just one more time.

“But of course, as players mature and maybe settle down or start a family that prospect withers with time.”

Meanwhile, following a review of a text message sent by Craig Gilroy that was used in evidence during the trial, the winger will miss Ulster’s game this weekend against Glasgow. He had already been absent for the wins over Edinburgh and Ospreys and will be available for selection on April 26 ahead of the final league game against Munster, away.

a setting less grave, it was the level of severe understatement that would have brought about a wry smile, maybe even a chuckle or two.

Under the circumstances, it was met with only serious nods.

“It’s not a situation I’ve ever found myself in before,” said head coach Jono Gibbes two weeks ago today of the elephant that has stomped around just about every square inch of every room in Kingspan Stadium during this dark season.

Two rows deep usually constitutes a full house at PRO14 previews, so that this answer from the departing Kiwi came in a press conference where sports journalists were outnumbered three-to-one by their news counterparts told its own tale of how the story of Paddy Jackson and Stuart Olding hadn’t ended the day the players were found not guilty of raping the same woman at Jackson’s home in June 2016.

The court of public opinion, that now sits daily on social media, had returned a different outcome and ensured a trial that lasted 42 days would rumble on long after Jackson stood on the Laganside steps and made clear his intention to return to both Ulster and Ireland duty as soon as possible.

It was naive to countenance any other occurrence. The lurid nature of the WhatsApp evidence had raised ire, the indefensible and reprehensible content giving example of what has been dubbed a toxic culture of masculinity.

Olding offered an apology for the events of that fateful night immediately after the verdict, Jackson followed suit some nine days later, but the damage to the all-important brand had been done.

While acquitted, both men showed remorse for their actions, an acknowledgement that not guilty did not mean blameless, and spoke of a commitment to ensure they can show those most distasteful messages — not a sackable offence in isolation it would appear — are not a true reflection of their character.

It will not, however, be with their native province. Any rehabilitation of image will occur overseas, it was confirmed on Friday.

The same fans who signed a petition calling for reinstatement have reacted to the revoking of the pair’s contracts with horror, but sport, now more than ever, is a business. Just under a fifth of Irish Rugby’s money comes from sponsorship. Bank of Ireland has been a part of this equation for two decades, the expressing of their misgivings on Wednes- day was a death knell. While the bank were the only ones to give more than a holding statement, others had the similar concerns that were relayed in a more private forum.

Disrepute, when mentioned in the same breath as “bringing your employer into”, is, of course, a blurred issue. In 1964, United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart said of defining something subjective, in this case, obscenity, “I know it when I see it.”

Many in rugby, and its crucial stakeholders, the sponsors, have applied a similar test here. Plenty has gone on in the past, and the very recent past at that, that’s been capable of skewing more than a handful of moral compasses. Racist and homophobic slurs have hit the headlines, players have not behaved as they should in the pub or behind the wheel, while even members of PETA would certainly have their own questions to ask were they to monitor the social media of every player the world over who at one time or another has inked a pro contract.

The point being that what is seen as beyond the pale for some isn’t always for others. There are a large number out there, whether they were a silent majority or a vocal minority, who believed t hat not guilty should have equated to free to play. Somebody somewhere though decided they cannot be associated with the men in question. And, for all intents and purposes, that was that.

While the fall-out shows no signs of abating, rather than looking back, the important issue now is how we move forward.