UK is yet to offer any credible alternative to backstop: Coveney
EU has no problem creating time for further Brexit talks but the UK must present a credible alternative to the backstop at those negotiations, the Tanaiste has said.
Irish Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney insisted the EU would negotiate five days a week if required.
On a visit to Helsinki yesterday he made clear the bloc would only accept changes to the withdrawal agreement if the UK presents a workable alternative to the backstop — something he said is yet to materialise.
The backstop, which offers an insurance policy to avoid a hard Irish border after Brexit, is the main obstacle to securing a deal.
Mr Coveney said it would not “fly” for the UK to ask the EU to accept the removal of the backstop on the promise of an alternative that had not emerged.
“I don’t think there’s any problem from an EU perspective in terms of making time available for negotiations,” he said.
“We all want to try to resolve these issues, we want to find a way of getting a deal that the UK is happy with and that the EU is happy with and can accept, too. There is no country that wants a deal more than Ireland.
“We want to get a deal that manages a sensible Brexit, that moves us into a transition period that gives us time and space to work out a future relationship.
“But that deal has to be based on the withdrawal agreement and it has to be consistent with that, and if the UK wants to remove an element of the withdrawal agreement they have to acknowledge that causes problems and they have to propose alternatives that can solve those problems, certainly in the case of the backstop.”
On Boris Johnson’s suggestion of negotiations for two days a week, Mr Coveney said: “I’m sure if he wanted five days of negotiations a week, the EU would be okay with that.
“Michel Barnier is there as the chief negotiator for that purpose, he has a team that’s ready to go.
“We all want to get a deal but at the moment nothing credible has come from the British Government in the context of an alternative to the backstop.
“If that changes, great. We’ll look at it in Dublin, but more importantly it can be the basis of a discussion in Brussels, but it’s got to be credible.
“It can’t simply be this notion that: ‘Look, we must have the backstop removed and we’ll solve this problem in the future negotiation, without any credible way of doing that’. That’s not going to fly and I think it’s important that we are all honest about that.
“We have always said if there are alternatives to the backstop that do the same job, then let’s hear them and if we can work out a deal on that basis, so be it.
“But what we will not do in Ireland, and I believe there is strong solidarity across the EU on this, we will not allow a really important element of the withdrawal agreement to be removed — i.e. the backstop, which solves a difficult problem, albeit on a temporary basis — and for that to be replaced with something that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny and is simply a promise that we’ll do our best to solve the problem, but not explain how.
“That is not an approach that either Ireland or the EU will support.”