Irish Independent

Latest cabinet is America First on steroids

- James Antle III James Antle III is politics editor of the Washington Examiner

NOT long after Rex Tillerson was fired, President Trump said: “I’m really at a point where we’re getting very close to having the Cabinet and other things that I want.”

That may be the main takeaway from the secretary of state’s firing: Trump is gradually shedding people and personnel who were restrainin­g him instead doing what he wants to do.

He recently imposed steel and aluminium tariffs over internal objections, a move that was followed by the resignatio­n of top economic adviser Gary Cohn, who was described by the president as a “globalist” and “not quite as strong on those tariffs”.

Tillerson was encouragin­g Trump to keep the Iran deal in place; he was a voice inside the administra­tion for staying in the Paris climate treaty; he encouraged diplomacy with North Korea at a time when the president was reproachin­g him on Twitter – the medium through which the secretary of state was eventually dismissed – for pursuing futile negotiatio­ns.

Replacing Tillerson with CIA director Mike Pompeo, as Trump hopes to do, increases the likelihood the nuclear deal former US President Barack Obama negotiated with Iran will be terminated.

It also signals a harder line on North Korea ahead of planned face-to-face talks between Trump and “little rocket man” Kim Jong-un.

Taken together with the tariffs and Trump’s unilateral decision to talk with the North Korean dictator in defiance of establishe­d foreign policy, it is a signal to the world the president will do whatever he feels necessary to protecting American interests – even if the profession­als don’t like it.

The big exception for many of Trump’s critics will be Russia: Tillerson’s firing comes the day after he went further than the White House press secretary in blaming Russia for the poisoning of a former spy and his daughter in Britain.

Republican­s on the House Intelligen­ce Committee also closed its Russia investigat­ion and exonerated Trump – prematurel­y, according to Democrats – the previous day.

But Pompeo is arguably more hawkish with regard to Russia than was Tillerson and has never doubted Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 presidenti­al election.

It is unlikely US policy toward Russia would become more conciliato­ry in a

Pompeorun State Department. Instead Trump will have a secretary of state who more clearly speaks for him than the hapless Tillerson and who is more closely aligned with him on major internatio­nal issues.

In a sense, that is a victory for “nationalis­ts” over “globalists” inside the administra­tion.

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon reportedly sent a journalist a celebrator­y text about Tillerson’s departure. The White House is projecting America First on steroids.

Yetitisals­oawinfora particular version of America First that is somewhat at odds with the way Trump campaigned as a sceptic of foreign wars.

Pompeo’s nomination was celebrated by senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain, who are both hawks and internatio­nalists.

Senator Rand Paul, who agreed with Trump that the Iraq war was a “disaster”, voted against Pompeo becoming CIA director.

Paul’s vote could be more important this time around. The Republican­s’ Senate majority is even smaller, 51-49.

Many Democrats, including Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, backed Pompeo for CIA director but they could make his confirmati­on hearings for his new position difficult.

It is therefore not guaranteed Pompeo will become secretary of state.

It is, however, another sign that cultivatin­g good relations with the president is essential for success inside the Trump administra­tion.

Tillerson never really denied calling Trump a “moron”.

Along with defence secretary James Mattis, treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House chief of staff John Kelly, he was viewed as an attempted moderating influence on the president – but not a particular­ly effective one.

Tillerson was not even very popular with those who agreed with his preference for diplomacy over confrontat­ion. This is largely because he was perceived as presiding over the State Department’s marginalis­ation. He was certainly at the helm as it was being downsized.

This made Mr Tillerson too isolated to perform well. If Mr Pompeo is indeed his successor, he will not initially share that problem.

When Ronald Reagan was president, conservati­ves used to plead with his more moderate and establishm­entfriendl­y advisers to “Let Reagan be Reagan”.

Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowsk­i has exhorted current White House staffers and Cabinet members to “Let Trump be Trump”.

It looks like Lewandowsk­i andthehawk­swillgetth­eir wish. Those hoping for a more restrained and realistic foreign policy may not be so lucky. (© Daily Telegraph, London)

 ??  ?? The rise of Mike Pompeo increases likelihood that nuclear deal with Iran will be terminated
The rise of Mike Pompeo increases likelihood that nuclear deal with Iran will be terminated

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland