Video evidence for rape trials worth considering

THE Belfast rape trial has generated widespread debate about how trials involving sex crimes are treated. That has been one of the few good outcomes from a most distressing business in which there have been absolutely no winners. The authorities in the Republic have repeatedly argued that there are more protections for complainants in this jurisdiction than there are in the North. But an overreliance on such defensive arguments risks missing the bigger point: we need to continually examine how we deal with this most difficult area.

We must minimise distress to the complainants and their families, while also at all times upholding the right to a fair trial for defendants. It is a difficult balance, but with the right attitude progress can be achieved.

So today we must welcome a major report into how sex crime investigations and trials are carried out in Ireland.

Among other things, this has called for pre-recorded cross-examinations to be introduced to provide better protection for vulnerable victims.

The report draws on the input of senior gardaí and Rape Crisis Network Ireland staff.

It has recommended new statutory provisions to allow for such pre-recorded video cross-examinations and interviews to be made admissible in court.

The Belfast rugby rape trial showed how difficult the court experience can be for witnesses. These recommendations are worthy of serious consideration.