Sunday Independent (Ireland)

Digital ads and delivery must click with online audiences as blocking boycott spreads

- STEVE DEMPSEY

HERE’S a theory: digital advertisin­g has been bad for advertisin­g. Ad fraud and a lack of transparen­cy around viewabilit­y have eroded trust. Invasive targeting and tracking have created a creepy dimension. The over-emphasis on metrics and measuremen­t has distracted from the need to drive real business outcomes, while small and disruptive formats limit creativity.

As a result digital ads suck. Audiences are turning them off in their droves. According to PageFair’s 2017 adblock report, 11pc of the global internet population is now blocking ads. It’s been called the biggest boycott of anything, ever. Thankfully, there seems to be some awareness that digital advertisin­g has over-promised and under-delivered; unless of course you’re Google or Facebook. It’s about time too.

If we’re to save the web from becoming a series of walled gardens that exist in the shadow of tech giants then we need better ads and a better approach to serving them to audiences. And advertisin­g as an industry needs to be careful that the worst elements of digital advertisin­g don’t spill into other media.

Brands seem to be getting cannier about their spend, prioritisi­ng quality over quantity. P&G did just earlier this year, cutting more than $100m in digital spending. P&G’s Marc Pritchard has also stressed the primacy of creativity. “Try and resist thinking about digital in terms of the tools, the platforms, the QR Codes and all of the technology coming next,” he said. “We try and see it for what it is, which is a tool to build our brands by reaching people with fresh creative campaigns... the era of digital marketing is over. It’s almost dead. It’s now just brand building.” Digital publishers are also trying to shake things up. Fusion Media Group is encouragin­g advertiser­s to make better ads by rewarding them with bonus impression­s. Display ads with high engagement rates can earn up to 20pc more impression­s on top of what was booked. The problem is how engagement is measured. There’s a chance that the most shameless click-jacking form of ads will be rewarded.

Another publisher taking a different tack is the Outline, a site which prides itself on its unique aesthetic. The Outline has done away with traditiona­l ad formats and created its own ad units. These custom-made and interactiv­e ads reach a smaller audience than generic formats, but they reportedly have a clickthrou­gh rate of 25 times the industry average.

At the same time it seems that the allure of low-rent, direct marketing digital tactics are encroachin­g into other media. Some TV companies in the US are trying to combine their mass–market offering with the promise of digital targeting. And AT&T’s acquisitio­n of Time Warner, announced last year, also seems to be about making advertisin­g more targeted.

It seems like a no-brainer, especially when you consider the potential of combining the data from the largest Pay-TV business in the US with mobile streaming and location data. AT&T is betting that the addition of its technology and user data will give their TV advertisin­g a critical edge — pinpoint audience targeting.

But data can serve two purposes. The first is market intelligen­ce that can inform creativity and strategic branding; the second is hyper-targeting.

The latter may generate clicks, if put in front of enough users, but whether it can create broad cultural relevance, an emotional link to a brand, and facilitate a price premium over time is questionab­le.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland