Sunday Independent (Ireland)

Roisin Shortall

An historic opportunit­y to transform the public health system should not be allowed to slip away, writes Roisin Shortall

- Roisin Shortall is a Social Democrat TD representi­ng Dublin North-West

AS the heartbreak­ing human cost of the CervicalCh­eck controvers­y reminds us, accountabi­lity within our health service is not some abstract notion.

It is a testament to the courage and selflessne­ss of Vicky Phelan that her clear message to the Public Accounts Committee last Wednesday was that she wants accountabi­lity, not revenge.

Yet in the heat of the political uproar a determined focus on achieving that accountabi­lity in our health service is getting lost in the clamour for heads.

It’s now a year since the publicatio­n of Slaintecar­e, a 10-year vision and plan for a radically reformed health system which has accountabi­lity at its very core.

Slaintecar­e is the work of a cross-party Oireachtas committee which I had the privilege of chairing. If implemente­d in full, it will deliver for Ireland the sort of accountabl­e, fair and effective public health system that we so desperatel­y need and deserve — and which most of our European neighbours currently enjoy.

The Slaintecar­e model — one that is tried and tested elsewhere — is for a universal, single tier healthcare system where patients are treated promptly and effectivel­y on the basis of medical need, rather than ability to pay.

In addition to fair access, the reforms are about shifting the delivery of our health services away from overcrowde­d and costly acute hospitals towards primary and social care services in local communitie­s.

It makes complete sense for services like minor injury care, chronic illness management, diagnostic services like scans and X-rays as well as mental health services, to be available through the local primary and social-care services.

But in addition to these reforms, Slaintecar­e is very explicit about the urgent need to legislate for accountabi­lity right across the health service from the Minister for Health, to senior management to clinicians.

It proposes an entirely new clinical governance framework within the health service with greatly improved structures and processes. This will provide much-needed clarity on reporting relationsh­ips — and a clear line of accountabi­lity.

For example, Slaintecar­e recommende­d that an independen­t oversight board for the HSE be reinstated. It also recommende­d that the current highly centralise­d, command and control management structure would be slimmed down and that legal responsibi­lity for service provision, decision-making and budgetary control would be devolved to local regional managers to support open communicat­ion, integratio­n and adaptation to change.

Since Slaintecar­e was launched, the Minister for Health has spoken many times of his commitment to it as the only game in town. I believe he is sincere. However his positive words have not been matched by action. For example, it would seem that it took the CervicalCh­eck crisis to put any urgency into the production of a bill to reinstate the HSE board.

But a new HSE board is by no means a panacea, it’s only one element of improved accountabi­lity.

What about the Minister’s accountabi­lity for the provision of adequate health services? What about legal accountabi­lity for the performanc­e of senior managers so that there are consequenc­es when things go wrong? And what about legal accountabi­lity for clinicians when the quality of care is not up to standard? If politician­s, from all sides, are serious about accountabi­lity, then they should be demanding that this legislatio­n be expedited.

While there has been some movement on other aspects of Slaintecar­e, progress has been painfully slow. An expert MESSAGE: Vicky Phelan group set up to examine the impact of separating private practice from the public hospital system — a central recommenda­tion of Slaintecar­e — is due to report in September.

Likewise, a public consultati­on is underway on how better to align community and hospital structures to ensure better integratio­n of health services, as well as better value for money.

However, the key recommenda­tion of Slaintecar­e was to set up an independen­t Implementa­tion Office, headed by an experience­d leader in health reform and with a separate budget and focus on making the much-needed reforms happen. As we approach the first anniversar­y of the publicatio­n of the Slaintecar­e report, this office has not yet been establishe­d. In respect of a senior person to lead it, the Minister’s mantra remains that this appointmen­t will happen soon.

The main fear is that the Government will cherry pick different elements of Slaintecar­e. Will vested interests within the system be allowed to continue to block the reforms needed to build a health system that is fair, accountabl­e and efficient? Do we have the political will to create a health service that we can actually be proud of ?

Slaintecar­e is a product of unpreceden­ted political co-operation in facing up to the deep-rooted cultural problems within our health service. It is a 10-year, fully-costed plan to provide the kind of modern and accessible health service which this country has lacked for so long. There is no alternativ­e solution.

Are we seriously going to let this historic opportunit­y for our health service to slip away?

We owe it to Vicky Phelan and countless others like her to do better.

‘Do we have the political will to create a service we can be proud of?’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland