Sunday Independent (Ireland)

Passion and strategy led to rugby victory

-

Sir —Neil Francis (Sport, November 3) attributes the Springbok Rugby World

Cup victory to Joe Schmidt’s “game plan”, implying that the Springbok coach and his team were incapable of creating and implementi­ng a matchwinni­ng strategy! This is a gross failure to recognise the degree of commitment and strategic planning, coupled to unbridled determinat­ion and passion, that characteri­sed the South African players and their coach, Rassie Erasmus, in preparatio­n for what turned out to be a masterclas­s performanc­e. The new rugby world champions need to be credited for their well-earned and spirited success, and their contributi­on to the healing of the rainbow nation back home.

Dr Neville Wilson,

Rathcore, Co Meath

Our real problems at the centre stage

Sir — The recent open letter from the Ireland’s Future group to an Taoiseach calling for a new conversati­on about the constituti­onal future of our island troubles me more than somewhat.

To say that Brexit has changed everything is an unacceptab­le broad brush assumption, especially as it has not yet happened, despite the best efforts of the many and because there is no clarity of detail on the ‘‘end game’’ at this point.

Stating that the reunificat­ion of Ireland has moved centre stage demands clarificat­ion as to the centre of whose stage. Perhaps this is true for those within the defined groups of the letter’s signatorie­s but I do not see it central to those who are poorly served by our health, housing and transport services nor to those of us who are greatly concerned about the future of the planet.

The ‘‘weighted’’ reference to unionists, I would maintain some rather than many, discussing their future within this island, is not in balance with the demeanour and actions of their elected representa­tives as witnessed since Brexit began.

Reference to a ‘‘new conversati­on’’ on Ireland is misleading, cueing that a utopia awaits discovery. Any conversati­on must be based on the wealth of discourse to date and while future conversati­on should not be constraine­d by the past it will have to be earnestly informed by the past.

In noting the various groups of signatorie­s, I do not see a category for retired citizens. Is this an omission or is it perhaps an indication that those of us who have lived, worked and raised families through some of the darkest days in our modern history would take a more astute and courtly approach?

Michael Gannon,

St Thomas’ Sq, Kilkenny

Inclusiven­ess is the best way forward

Sir — I like to read Eoghan Harris every week and though not always agreeing with him, enjoy the other perspectiv­e. Last week I did not exactly agree with his ideas or his affection for the DUP as I find they don’t listen to the people they supposedly represent. They seem to stir anger and wrath when tranquilit­y and peace breaks out. They change all agreements and agendas to suit themselves and certainly would not be a voice of reason. Mr Harris is also not a supporter of the Alliance Party and actually called them ‘‘The Dalliance Party’’.

I think they are far more moderate in their views, non-sectarian and a progressiv­e party for the future in Northern Ireland. The way forward is not with bitterness or hatred but integratio­n and moving to an inclusiven­ess for all on our island. The largest parties in not working for nearly three years have neglected some very important issues, both social and economic. With an election in a month’s time, the people must consider all options and see who will work best for them and not complain if they haven’t exercised their franchise!

Ken Maher,

Kilcoole, Co Wicklow.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Ireland