The Jerusalem Post

House postpones action on antisemiti­sm bill

-

The House of Representa­tives delayed action on a bill targeting campus antisemiti­sm until 2017, putting off action on a measure that had been backed by mainstream Jewish groups, criticized by civil libertaria­ns and passed unanimousl­y by the Senate on December 1.

Jewish Insider reported Friday, citing an anonymous congressio­nal staff official, that Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Virginia), chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, opposed “rushing” the bill through the House without adequate study.

The bill outlined when criticism of Israel crosses into antisemiti­sm, citing the “three D’s” first advanced by Jewish Agency Chairman Natan Sharansky, the Israeli politician and former prisoner of the Soviet gulag: demonizati­on, double standards and delegitimi­zation.

The act billed itself as a tool “to help identify contempora­ry manifestat­ions of antisemiti­sm, and includes useful examples of discrimina­tory anti-Israel conduct that crosses the line into antisemiti­sm.”

The Anti-Defamation League, which led lobbying for the legislatio­n, said the bill, should it become law, “addresses a core concern of Jewish and pro-Israel students and parents: When does the expression of antisemiti­sm, anti-Israel sentiment and anti-Zionist beliefs cross the line from First Amendment-protected free expression to unlawful discrimina­tory conduct?”

Critics of the bill included Michael Macleod-Ball, chief of staff of the American Civil Liberties Union’s legislativ­e office in Washington, who told The Forward that the bill could impinge on the free-speech rights of critics of Israel. The act “opens the door to considerin­g anti-Israel political statements and activities as possible grounds for civil rights investigat­ions,” he said.

Kenneth Stern, who as the American Jewish Committee’s former specialist on antisemiti­sm and extremism wrote a similar definition of antisemiti­sm later adopted by the Department of State, told the Forward that the congressio­nal version is “both unconstitu­tional and unwise.”

A number of left-wing and pro-Palestinia­n groups had criticized the legislatio­n. (JTA)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel