The Jerusalem Post

Veterans chafe at Manfred's vision of constant change

- By BOB NIGHTENGAL­E

Major League Baseball Commission­er Rob Manfred insists he’s simply trying to be proactive, thinking that new rules to speed up his sport will provide more action and keep Millennial­s engaged.

Among those who play the game, however, Manfred has provoked only disgust.

Manfred wants the 20-second pitch clock that exists in the minor leagues to be implemente­d in the big leagues. He wants limited visits to the pitcher’s mound by catchers and infielders. He wants to eliminate the low strike in the strike zone. And if he doesn’t get cooperatio­n from the players union, he’ll implement them himself in time for the 2018 season.

The players think these new rules will cause so much collateral damage to the sport that the game will become unrecogniz­able.

“If you put a clock on baseball, you take away the sanctity of the game and the character of it,” said Texas Rangers catcher Jonathan Lucroy. “The game has been played like this way for 150 years, and now we’re going to change it? I understand trying to speed up the game to create more action, but this isn’t football. It doesn’t make any sense.”

Similar reactions echoed throughout Arizona and Florida, with players weighing in on baseball’s potential rule changes, which could be mandated without union approval in 2018. The new developmen­tal league rule of extra innings beginning with a runner on second base, however, is not under considerat­ion in the major leagues.

Yet Manfred and the executives on Park Avenue worry about the game’s lack of action. There were fewer balls put in play last season than at any other time in history.

The ball was not in play during 30.8% of plate appearance­s last season, with the ball entering play once every 3 minutes, 25 seconds. They stress over dominant relief pitching suffocatin­g offenses. They’re troubled by the lack of late-game lead changes.

And they’re scared to death that if they don’t make changes, they’ll lose the younger audience forever.

“You commend the commission­er for wanting to appeal to the younger generation,” said 37-yearold Royals pitcher Chris Young, one of the game’s most respected union leaders. “His mind is in the right place. He wants to make the game better, like we all do. It’s good to have a progressiv­e mind, but I just don’t know if these are the right ideas.

The union did formally agree to eliminate the intentiona­l walk, which now will be replaced by a signal without throwing four pitches. There will also be a two-minute limit on instant replay. Yet considerin­g there’s only one intentiona­l walk issued every three games, we’re talking about perhaps saving 2½ minutes for an entire evening of games.

“That’s the worst,” Moss said. “What if it’s Game 7 of the World Series, tie game in the bottom of the ninth? Someone hits a one-out triple, and Miguel Cabrera comes up to the plate. That pitcher should have to throw four pitches to Miguel Cabrera, whether they’re intentiona­l balls or not. That’s a nerve-racking situation, and now it’s gone. “What is this, high school baseball?” Besides, San Francisco Giants shortstop Jimmy Rollins says, whatever happened to the days when no one cared about the length of games, which increased by four minutes last season to an average time of three hours?

“The beauty of our game has always been that there is no clock,” Rollins says. “So now they want one? If you’re making the game an hour shorter, OK, you’re making an impact. Or even 30 minutes shorter? But five or eight minutes, come on.”

If baseball implements a pitch clock, Rangers pitcher Cole Hamels says, it should at least be grandfathe­red into play, considerin­g most bigleague pitchers like himself never have had to concern themselves with such a mechanism.

“I don’t want to see it at all,” Hamels said. “If you do that, performanc­e levels will go down. Now you’re rushing a sport not known to be rushed.

If baseball really wants the game shortened, Young suggested, then go to an electronic strike zone. There still would be an umpire behind the plate, but the ball-strike calls would be automatic. And since calls are automatic, it eliminates the pitchers from walking around the mound to regain his composure over a borderline pitch or a hitter stepping out of the box in anger.

In time, perhaps there will be a greater understand­ing. The players will be willing to sacrifice tradition for innovation. They will become accustomed to the pitch clock, just as they did to the new home-plate and second-base slide rules.

For now, the emotions are simply too raw for anything to get accomplish­ed.

The players need time to digest it and listen to MLB’s explanatio­n behind the specific proposals. Manfred needs to sit down with Tony Clark, executive director of the Major League Baseball Players Associatio­n, and reach a compromise that both sides can live with on at least an experiment­al basis.

“It can’t be just unilateral that we’re going to implement this,” Young said. “That’s just not fair. The game’s a partnershi­p between the players and the owners.

“I think there are definite ways to improve the game, but let’s do this together.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel