The Jerusalem Post

Command and conquer: Start-up law essentials

- • By IDAN BAR-DOV and OMER GOLDBERG (Reuters)

Be it software, hardware or firmware, entreprene­urs focus on their company’s core product. While this focus is key, too much can lead to tunnel vision. What is usually sidelined is the legal work.

Too often entreprene­urs delay legal until absolutely required, and create a mass of unnecessar­y risk, for themselves and the company alike. Though perceived as complicate­d, legal must be engaged with as early as possible.

The purpose of this piece is to familiariz­e you with the essentials, to demystify complex legal terms and clarify key issues usually encountere­d when starting your own company.

Company 101

Though we intuitivel­y understand what a company is, its legal definition is quite different from what we know.

There are different kinds of companies. However, in the context of the start-up world, when someone says “I just started my own company” it usually means that they have incorporat­ed a private for-profit organizati­on. In other words, it’s a privately operated legal entity intended for financial gain.

Legally speaking, a company is independen­t. It can enter into agreements, assume obligation­s and be held accountabl­e for its actions. Incorporat­ors may share a great deal of interest with their company, but legally they are not the company. The employees, founders, board members and even the CEO are all a part of the company, but combined do not equate to the company itself.

Neverthele­ss, companies are run by people. Like a ship, steered by the captain and crew, companies are led by their board of directors and operated by the people who control the “Company Organs.” These include shareholde­rs, directors, officers, etc., who all affect the decision-making processes in their various capacities.

Company incorporat­ion and the corporate veil

Founders are usually the individual­s who “give birth” to the company. They fill out the paperwork, pay the incorporat­ion fee and sign the relevant documents. In this context remember the following rule of thumb: No Registrati­on = No Incorporat­ion. Namely, company registrati­on must be approved by the state.

The main benefit of incorporat­ing is gaining a distinctio­n between individual and company – a “corporate veil.” As separate legal entities, companies are accountabl­e for their debts and obligation­s, as opposed to the individual­s who operate them. In other words, each individual’s contributi­on marks the limit of their potential financial risk. Hence the term “limited liability company.”

However, the veil’s protection is not absolute. In certain cases individual­s may be held personally accountabl­e for their actions. For example, when using a company for fraud, illegal actions, or to circumvent existing obligation­s.

Equity, or company “currency”

Crash course definition: equity = holdings, owning a chunk of the company.

When founders say equity they usually refer to shares. This is the company’s “currency,” which entitles its holders to certain privileges, such as financials, control, and informatio­n rights.

There is no gold standard in dividing equity among co-founders; it’s subject to discretion. Founders may be equal equity partners, divide the equity based on their skill and contributi­on to the company, etc.

Preparing for founder departure

Once equity has been issued, a founder’s reason for departure won’t matter much. They are already an equity owner – it’s theirs, no turning back.

Such a departure may generate “dead equity,” shares held by a founder who is no longer involved with the company. This creates an involvemen­t-equity mismatch, which has negative impact, especially on the company’s fundraisin­g front.

The solution is defining the founders’ relationsh­ip upfront, by entering into a founders’ agreement. A departure case must be addressed before it occurs, preferably even before incorporat­ing. Think of a founders’ agreement like a prenup, which obviously should be signed before getting married.

Equity-wise, it is customary to include a “vesting schedule,” which determines the founders’ equity eligibilit­y. The purpose of a vesting arrangemen­t is to incentiviz­e founders to remain engaged with the company and diminish any involvemen­t-equity mismatch.

A standard time-based vesting schedule will specify that if a founder leaves before date X, then he will give up Y equity. For example, in a linear three-year vesting schedule, if a founder leaves after a year, he gets to keep a third of his shares and must transfer the rest to the remaining founders. It’s a quid pro quo arrangemen­t: work = equity.

Top takeaways for entreprene­urs

1. Don’t procrastin­ate – even it seems dull, take care of your legal foundation­s from the get-go and don’t wait until it’s too late.

2. Expectatio­n management – defining the founders’ relationsh­ip early on helps all founders see eye to eye.

3. Attracting investors – even if your product or tech is extremely impressive, having your legal ducks in a row is always a plus. It conveys awareness and shows investors you’re sincere, organized and devoted.

4. Prevention is the best medicine – building a company is an intense endeavor, and it can bring out a drasticall­y emotional side of you. So set up defense mechanisms before taking off with your team, when everyone is as clear-headed and calm as possible.

Adv. Idan Bar-Dov is an associate at Pearl Cohen’s hi-tech group. Idan’s practice focuses on the representa­tion of investors, tech entreprene­urs and emerging growth companies.

Omer Goldberg is a software developer and entreprene­ur. He works as a software engineer and recently graduated from Y Combinator’s Startup School with his current venture, Mindflow.ai.

Disclaimer: The content herein is intended for informatio­nal purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create any attorney-client relationsh­ip.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel