The Jerusalem Post

Antisemiti­c slurs and their facilitato­rs

- • By MANFRED GERSTENFEL­D (Reuters)

The analysis of contempora­ry antisemiti­sm is becoming increasing­ly complex. In 2010 the Simon Wiesenthal Center (SWC) undertook the laudable initiative to publish the top 10 major slurs or incidents every year. The size of these SWC documents and the number of antisemiti­c incidents included under each of the headings has substantia­lly increased over the years.

This year again there are many candidates that could be included in the SWC publicatio­n. There are the annual recidivist­s such as the BBC and the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Jewish Voice for Peace movement is one of the 10 most anti-Israeli organizati­ons in the United States according to the Anti Defamation League and could be added to the list of recurrent slur producers.

One among many new candidates for the list is Kada Traore, the murderer of French Jewish woman Sarah Halimi. Abdoe Khoulani, a member of the municipali­ty of The Hague on behalf of a Muslim party could also be included. When a parliament­arian of the Dutch Christian party SGP received a group of Israeli school children Khoulani tweeted: “Zionist terrorists in the making neatly visit the SGP. These are the future child murderers and occupiers.” The Dutch prosecutio­n office decided that this was protected speech.

Beyond antisemiti­c slurs and incidents more attention should also be given to those who facilitate the classic antisemiti­sm and anti-Israelism of others. Such facilitati­on can be done in a variety of ways without the perpetrato­rs meeting the criteria of the most common definition of antisemiti­sm. This definition, of the Internatio­nal Holocaust Remembranc­e Associatio­n (IHRA), required the approval of its 31 member countries, all from the Western world.

A few examples enable one to better understand the issue. Antisemiti­sm in the British Labour Party became more visible a few months after it elected Jeremy Corbyn as its leader in 2015. Part of Corbyn’s own behavior and statements came close to antisemiti­sm without however meeting the IHRA definition. For instance, he donated money to and appeared at meetings of an organizati­on headed by Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. He also called Hezbollah and Hamas his “friends.” Corbyn furthermor­e appointed extreme anti-Israel individual­s to high positions. All this encouraged others in the party to make antisemiti­c statements.

American Senator Bernie Sanders, who participat­ed in the 2016 presidenti­al primaries of the Democratic Party, is yet another facilitato­r. He stated that the United States should not limit its friendship to Israel alone, but should also be friendly toward the Palestinia­ns. An ADL study found that the highest percentage of antisemite­s in the world – over 90% – can be found among the Palestinia­n population.

Facilitati­on of antisemiti­sm is far from a new phenomenon. One cannot claim that the London municipali­ty is an antisemiti­c body. Shimon Samuels of the Simon Wiesenthal Center however recalls that the third European Social Forum took place in London in 2004. He remarked: “Much of its funding was provided by the London Municipali­ty, whose mayor at the time was leftist Ken Livingston­e. This forum largely focused on hate-mongering against Israel.”

The trend of facilitati­ng antisemiti­sm seems to be accelerati­ng. There are a variety of campuses in the US where anti-Israel activities take place. The heads of several universiti­es close their eyes to expression­s of extreme antisemiti­sm. This has been going on for a number of years.

Facilitati­on of anti-Israeli sentiment comes in many ways. In 2007 Brandeis University invited former US president and anti-Israel inciter Jimmy Carter to speak about his book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. The university went ahead with its invitation despite the fact that Carter refused to debate Alan Dershowitz, which was the original proposal.

Recently, Robert Barchi, the president of Rutgers University, called the extreme statements of three professors there “protected speech.” The Jewish campus group Rutgers Hillel expressed its concerns that these scholars each “gives voice to traditiona­l racist, anti-Jewish tropes.”

The New School in New York invited Linda Sarsour and a representa­tive of Jewish Voice for Peace to be part of a panel on antisemiti­sm. Sarsour backs the BDS movement to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel.

A facilitato­r of antisemiti­sm in a somewhat different way is Prof. Barry Trachtenbe­rg of Wake University. Research shows that Holocaust abuse has greatly expanded in recent years. However, Trachtenbe­rg gave testimony before the US House Judiciary committee on November 7, 2017, declaring: “There is nothing necessaril­y wrong in comparing the actions of Israel to those of Nazi Germany.” He continued: “In fact, comparison­s of foreign leaders and countries to Nazism are made regularly.” Many of the latter comparison­s are also Holocaust abuse. Trachtenbe­rg thus justifies antisemiti­c statements by claiming that Holocaust abuse terminolog­y is also frequently used against nonJews.

All the above however pales when compared to the facilitati­on of antisemiti­sm by a variety of Western countries. These have allowed massive non-selective immigratio­n from Muslim countries where the great majority of the population is antisemiti­c. As a result antisemiti­sm among local Muslims is far greater in these Western countries than among the native population.

The author is emeritus chairman of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. He was given the Lifetime Achievemen­t Award by the Journal for the Study of Antisemiti­sm, and the Internatio­nal Leadership Award by the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

 ??  ?? WHO IS facilitati­ng antisemiti­sm in London.
WHO IS facilitati­ng antisemiti­sm in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel