The Jerusalem Post

Pew is non-partisan

-

In “Democrats remain in the pro-Israel camp, despite Pew Poll” (Comment & Features, February 4), Ron Klein criticizes a recent Pew Research Center report that examines public opinion toward Israel and the Palestinia­ns.

He cites a piece by Tamara Wittes and Daniel Shapiro published by The Atlantic. Wittes and Shapiro focus primarily on the wording of a question that asks with which side in the Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict a respondent sympathize­s more. They write that “[t]he poll question is faulty because sympathy for Palestinia­ns should not imply hostility to Israel, nor should sympathy for Israel require disregard for the fate of Palestinia­ns.”

This is an interpreta­tion we are careful to avoid in our report. As mentioned in the article, respondent­s could volunteer other responses, such as “both” or “neither,” or simply not answer the question. Throughout, we draw attention to the shares who do not sympathize more with either Israel or the Palestinia­ns.

The report also stated that in the past year, the share of Democrats who “don’t know” has risen from 17% to 25% while the share saying “both” or “neither” has increased from 19% to 23%. This question has been asked in various forms since 1978, and not 2001, as Wittes and Shapiro write.

In addition, the report makes clear that this is a question intended to measure sympathies for Israel or the Palestinia­ns in the Middle East, not to measure support for Israel. We understand that this “forced choice” question about sympathies for Israel and the Palestinia­ns alone does not provide a complete picture of opinions about Israel or the Palestinia­ns. For that reason, we have asked about “sympathy” for Israel and the Palestinia­ns in separate questions (i.e., one about sympathy toward Israel and another about sympathy toward Palestinia­ns, in random order), most recently in March 2015.

Those measures also found sizable, though somewhat narrower, partisan difference­s than the forced choice question: 79% of Republican­s sympathize­d “a lot” or “some” with Israel, compared with 57% of Democrats. While more than half of Democrats (54%) expressed at least some sympathy for the Palestinia­ns, fewer Republican­s (33%) said the same.

The question Wittes and Shapiro criticize is one of many we regularly ask about the Middle East, and the 40-year-long trend allows us to track opinion over time. However, we pose other questions relevant to the Israeli-Palestinia­n conflict and provide detailed subgroup (not just partisan) analyses of these questions.

Our recent report included questions about the possibilit­y of a two-state solution and views of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both of these questions contribute to a wider understand­ing of relevant public opinion, and responses also revealed wide partisan gaps.

Finally, Wittes and Shapiro claim that the Pew Research Center “marketed” the poll’s results. The center is committed to objectivit­y, accuracy, rigor and transparen­cy; we are a non-partisan and non-advocacy organizati­on that does not take policy positions on issues and while we present our survey findings to the public, we do not “market” them.

CARROLL DOHERTY Washington The writer is director of political research for the Pew Research Center.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel