The Jerusalem Post

Will USC’s Sam Darnold or Wyoming’s Josh Allen be No. 1 pick?

- R #Z .*,& +0/&4 (Reuters)

The top quarterbac­k prospects entering the 2018 NFL draft: 1. Sam Darnold, USC (6-3, 221 pounds): He possesses all of the desired physical tools and intangible­s for a franchise quarterbac­k – big arm, good mobility, pocket presence, a knack for extending plays and strong leadership. Darnold didn’t throw at the scouting combine but did impress teams during interviews. He later dazzled with his pro day performanc­e. Darnold completed 63% of his passes for 4,143 yards and 26 touchdowns last season but was also picked off 13 times and fumbled a dozen more. He’s spent a lot of time working to improve his ball security, and it shouldn’t cost him in the draft. Projected: potential No. 1 pick.

2. Josh Allen, Wyoming (6-5, 237): No quarterbac­k has helped himself as much during the pre-draft process. During the Senior Bowl, Allen proved that, despite coming from a small school, he can compete against topend talent. He showed off his cannon of an arm, doing so again at the combine. At times during the Senior Bowl, receivers had trouble catching his passes, so he has to work on his touch. Accuracy had ranked among his weaknesses, but he displayed improvemen­t at the combine and at his pro day. Evaluators believe Allen can develop into a Ben Roethlisbe­rger-type quarterbac­k. Projected: potential No. 1 pick.

3. Baker Mayfield, Oklahoma (6-1, 215): The most prolific passer in the draft, he’s coming off of a Heisman Trophy campaign that saw him record 41 touchdown passes and only five intercepti­ons in the regular season. Highly accurate, Mayfield completed more than 70% of his passes each of the past two years. He does a great job hitting receivers in stride, often leading to additional yards after the catch. Mayfield had some maturity issues to address the past few months, but he interviewe­d well with teams, impressing them with his candor and sense of accountabi­lity. He’s undersized but knows how to deliver the football and lead. Projected: potential top five.

4. Josh Rosen, UCLA (6-4, 226): THE PERCEPTION about this year’s NFL Draft quarterbac­k class is that it’s deep and more talented than usual at the top-end, with USC’s Sam Darnold (left) and Wyoming’s Josh Allen (right) leading a polarizing group and one of them expected to be selected by the Cleveland Browns with the top pick on Thursday night. Many call him the most natural passer in this class. Fundamenta­ls, field vision, decision-making – all top notch. But two primary areas could hinder Rosen. He’s got a thin frame and suffered two concussion­s in college, so some talent evaluators question his durability. Rosen’s leadership abilities also have come under question. Some people familiar with him say he can rub people the wrong way, and others fear he lacks an appreciati­on for the game. If Rosen can dispel those concerns, he should be just fine. Projected: potential top five.

5. Mason Rudolph, Oklahoma State (6-5, 235): Coming off of a career year (4,904 yards, 37 touchdowns, just 9 intercepti­ons), he offers intrigue and upside. He’s big with great arm strength and, after interviewi­ng and performing well at the combine, has improved his stock. Rudolph still needs work having run a spread offense that never required him to call plays in a huddle or take snaps under center, but he has the desire and smarts to develop. The ideal situation is for him to go to a team with an establishe­d veteran, which would afford him time to develop. Projected: Round 1-2.

6. Lamar Jackson, Louisville (6-2, 216): One of the most electrifyi­ng athletes in the draft, he’s had to answer questions about his ability to play quarterbac­k in the NFL. Jackson wants nothing to do with talk of a switch to wide receiver, which is why he didn’t run at the combine or his pro day. He’s also made things harder for himself by deciding not to hire an agent. Some teams have had trouble contacting him to schedule meetings or workouts, so it will be interestin­g to see if that costs him in the draft. Jackson also needs refinement of his skills. As is the case with every quarterbac­k, fit is extremely important. Jackson would benefit from a creative offensive coordinato­r who can capitalize on his mobility and is perhaps willing to implement elements of Louisville’s offense to help ease the rookie’s transition. Projected: Round 1-2.

7. Luke Falk, Washington State (6-4, 215): He also put up big numbers while running a spread offense. Falk has an above average arm but only average mobility. He could eventually develop into a solid NFL starter. But first, he’ll have to bulk up and do a better job of reading coverages. Additional­ly, he needs learn how to play under center. Projected: Round 2-4.

8. Kyle Lauletta, Richmond (6-3, 222): A dark horse from a small school, he shined at the Senior Bowl, earning MVP honors, and further strengthen­ed his standing with a strong combine. He’s a perfect project to groom behind a starter for a few seasons. Projected: Round 2-4.

9. Mike White, Western Kentucky (6-5, 224): A former pitcher who threw 90 miles per hour in high school, he has naturally power and touch in his arm. White has demonstrat­ed an ability to scan the field and work through progressio­ns, however he lacks feel in the pocket and isn’t especially mobile. Anticipati­on and ball security can improve. Projected: Round 3-5.

10. Chase Litton, Marshall (6-6, 232): An early-entry candidate whom some believed would benefit from remaining in college. He locks onto targets and needs to improve his ability to adjust on the fly. Size is a plus. Projected: Round 5-6.

(USA Today/TNS)

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel