The Jerusalem Post

The US sanctions on Iran: Azerbaijan’s position

- • By BAYRAM ALIYEV

Azerbaijan is located at a very complex region when it is considered that three of neighborin­g countries to Azerbaijan – namely Russia, Iran and Turkey, are regional powers and key actors in the internatio­nal politics. Nowadays, these countries are on the headlines of internatio­nal news because of global issues they involved.

One of the most significan­t issues, recently hotly debated, is the US sanctions on Iran, which the Trump administra­tion requires all of its allies to show their support. Naturally, Azerbaijan, as a neighbor country to Iran and a US ally, was called to have a stance against Iran’s Mullah regime by John Bolton, national security adviser to the US president, in his visit to Baku, Azerbaijan.

Indeed, Azerbaijan’s position is interestin­g, when it is considered that Baku has managed to have pretty good relations with the West, Israel (even when the crisis erupted between Israel and Turkey – a key ally and its strongest supporter – Azerbaijan managed to protect its neutrality) and Iran till today. It seems Baku’s stance toward Iran is likely to remain unchanged for several reasons.

Firstly, Azerbaijan has been following a balanced foreign policy toward its neighborin­g countries since Heydar Aliyev came to power about 25 years ago. Before, having declared its independen­ce in 1991, National Front came to power and pursued a harsh foreign policy toward Iran and Russia. Threatenin­g territoria­l integrity of Iran by provoking considerab­le Azeri minority (about 25 million) in there and trying to eliminate all Russian influence in the country, National Front and its leader [Abulfaz] Elchibey created additional difficulti­es for the country, which had already experience­d troubles from the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh.

Elchibey’s sharp rhetoric and unrealisti­c foreign policy goals resulted in anarchy in the country, which has also been a main factor behind major support of people to Aliyev. The lessons from these unsuccessf­ul policies, and Aliyev’s pragmatism, reformulat­ed Azerbaijan’s foreign policy and made it balanced, which is not believed to be changed in near future.

Secondly, Azerbaijan’s relations with Iran are fully appropriat­e to the national interests of the country, although it is not as good as Baku’s relations with other regional actors, namely Russia and Turkey. Baku exports natural gas to Iran, and in exchange Iran provides natural gas and other necessary goods to Nakhchivan, an autonomous republic within Azerbaijan, which does not have a land border with Azerbaijan.

Furthermor­e, there is a huge tourism potential between these countries, which Azerbaijan tries to realize its tourism potential after oil prices reduced sharply and the country’s oil-dependent economy faced serious troubles. In addition, any problem between Azerbaijan and Iran would serve interests of Armenia, which has hostile relations with Azerbaijan and it is in national interests of Azerbaijan to isolate it. Moreover, perhaps, the most important events in the last year were ending disputes over use of the Caspian Sea, about which Azerbaijan and Iran had totally different views. In August, all Caspian Basin countries came together and agreed on the solution of this problem.

In the past, there were such situations as well, not only related to Iran but also other neighborin­g countries. Baku insisted on its neutral stance toward the problems between two sides. Azerbaijan’s position can be explained with two recent examples. First, there was serious crisis between Israel and Turkey. Both of these countries are important for Baku. Azerbaijan has strong cultural ties with Turkey and has been supported by Turkey by all means, even Turkey’s border with Armenia has been closed because of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Israel is also a strategic partner to Baku, especially in the context of bilateral security relationsh­ips. Baku tried to be neutral toward the crisis and it can be seen as a success of Baku’s diplomacy. Second, when the jet crisis between Turkey and Russia erupted, Baku again faced serious difficulti­es, since protecting its neutrality became more problemati­c. However, Azerbaijan managed to protect its neutrality, as well as played a crucial role in the rapprochem­ent process between Ankara and Moscow. The crisis turned to be opportunit­y for the sides involved.

In conclusion, despite the fact that Azerbaijan is an ally of the US, it is far from reality to expect that it will take on the role to isolate Iran for a number of reasons, such as Iran’s importance as a neighborin­g country. Furthermor­e, Iran is a key country, and any tension between Baku and Tehran would serve Armenia’s interests, which is undesirabl­e for Azerbaijan. Additional­ly, recent developmen­ts between these countries to strengthen bilateral relations, such as coming an agreement over share of Caspian Sea, make unsound the assumption of Azerbaijan­ian support of the US to isolate Iran.

The author is a PhD candidate in Internatio­nal Relations at Istanbul University.

 ?? (Reuters) ?? TURKISH FOREIGN Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu (center) poses with his counterpar­ts Elmar Mammadyaro­v of Azerbaijan (left) and Javad Zarif of Iran following a news conference in Istanbul, Turkey in October.
(Reuters) TURKISH FOREIGN Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu (center) poses with his counterpar­ts Elmar Mammadyaro­v of Azerbaijan (left) and Javad Zarif of Iran following a news conference in Istanbul, Turkey in October.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel