Mitsubishi Motors executive says Nissan-Renault alliance can survive
OKAZAKI, Japan (Reuters) – A senior executive at Mitsubishi Motors Corp said on Tuesday its alliance with Nissan Motor and Renault SA can survive management upheaval, a day after it fired Carlos Ghosn as chairman citing financial misconduct.
The future of the 19-year alliance, one of the biggest automotive groups in the world, has been thrown into doubt after the November 19 arrest and subsequent ousting of Ghosn as chairman of both Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors.
Ghosn, 64, is the architect of the alliance and its chairman. He also remains CEO and chairman of Renault.
Senior executives of the alliance are due to meet for their regularly scheduled gathering later this week in Amsterdam that sources said would start on Wednesday.
Executives are also expected to discuss Ghosn’s chairmanship of the alliance, one source at Nissan told Reuters, seeking anonymity because the contents of the meeting are not public.
Mitsubishi CEO Osamu Masuko said on Monday he will join the meeting via video conference, while Nissan CEO Hiroto Saikawa, who remains in Japan, hasn’t decided whether he will travel for the meeting, two company sources said. Nissan declined to comment.
A major longer-term focus is whether and how the capital alliance structure might evolve, as Ghosn, under pressure from the French government, had pushed for a deeper tie-up, including potentially a full merger between Renault and Nissan, despite strong reservations at Nissan.
Renault holds around 43% of Nissan, which in turn owns a controlling 34% stake in Mitsubishi Motors. Nissan, the biggest partner in the alliance by sales, has a non-voting 15% stake in the French partner.
Speaking to reporters at a research and development center in Okazaki, central Japan, Mitsubishi Executive Vice President Mitsuhiko Yamashita said that regardless of the shape the alliance takes, the three companies would continue to source more parts together and leverage their ties to develop new technologies.
“I can’t say how the three-way partnership might evolve, but as car-making requires more and more new technologies, the days when a single car maker can handle everything on its own are going to disappear,” said Yamashita, who once served as Nissan’s top engineer.
He said that the alliance would need to work out who would make decisions, and how, without the binding figure of Ghosn, but was confident the partnership was strong enough to withstand the challenge.
“Renault and Nissan have a history of nearly 20 years, and we’re coming up on two years since Mitsubishi Motors joined,” he said. “The foundation on which the cooperation has been built is becoming strong so I have faith that we can work with that.”
Sealed in 1999 when Nissan was rescued from near-bankruptcy, the Franco-Japanese alliance was enlarged in 2016 to include Mitsubishi and enabled the members to jointly develop products and control costs.
Yamashita’s remark echoes comments by Saikawa, who told staff in a town hall meeting on Monday that the alliance remained important to generate synergies.
Saikawa also said that there was an “excessive concentration of power” on Ghosn, and that in future alliance members should communicate better to help preserve their independence.
Ghosn is in detention in Tokyo over suspicion of financial misconduct, including alleged understating of his income and personal use of corporate money. He has denied those allegations, public broadcaster NHK has reported.
He has not made public comments on those allegations and Reuters could not contact him or his lawyers for comments.
In fresh allegations on Tuesday, Japanese media reported that Ghosn had shifted personal investment losses incurred during the 2008 financial crisis to Nissan to avoid millions of dollars in losses for himself.
Citing multiple unnamed sources, the Asahi Shimbun newspaper said that when Ghosn’s bank had called for more collateral from the executive, he instead handed the rights over the derivatives trade to Nissan, which effectively shouldered 1.7 billion yen ($15 million) in losses.
Japan’s Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC) discovered this incident during that year’s routine inspection, the newspaper said.
Nissan said it could not comment on the report. An SESC spokesman said the watchdog could not comment on individual cases.