The Jerusalem Post

Trump expected to sign bipartisan funding deal

- • By RICHARD COWAN and SUSAN CORNWELL

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Congress faced a tight deadline on Wednesday to pass a bipartisan accord to avert another US government shutdown as news outlets reported President Donald Trump planned to sign the deal as he eyes other ways to fund his wall without lawmakers.

On Wednesday, CNN, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal all reported that Trump intended to sign the measure into law if it passes Congress. Representa­tives for the White House could not be reached immediatel­y for comment.

Trump on Tuesday, however, did not rule out vetoing the legislatio­n and said he was not happy with the deal, which denies him funds for his US-Mexico border wall. But he also said he did not expect another shutdown.

The Democratic-controlled House of Representa­tives could vote as soon as Wednesday evening, a senior aide said, despite not yet having produced a written copy of the agreement reached by congressio­nal negotiator­s on Monday night.

The accord must also be passed by the Republican-controlled Senate and signed by Trump by the midnight Friday expiration of a stopgap measure that ended the longest federal shutdown in US history.

The measure’s fate in the House was far from certain, given the risk that conservati­ves and liberals will oppose the compromise for different reasons.

Congressio­nal sources said the deal includes $1.37 billion for new border fencing, about the same as last year – along 55 miles (90 km) of the border – but not the $5.7 billion Trump has demanded to help build his promised border wall.

Senior congressio­nal Republican­s, showing little appetite for another shutdown after being heavily criticized for the previous one, urged Trump to support the agreement.

Trump surprised lawmakers when he withdrew support for a previous deal in December and demanded the $5.7 billion in wall funding, opposed by congressio­nal Democrats. That triggered the 35-day shutdown of about a fourth of the federal government that left 800,000 federal workers furloughed or working without pay.

The Post, citing a White House official, said Trump was likely to explore using his executive power to reallocate other federal funds for barrier projects.

CNN, citing the White House, also said that Trump was weighing the use of an executive order, among other options.

The president previously threatened to declare a “national emergency” if Congress did not provide money specifical­ly for the wall, an action under which he might redirect other funds already provided by Congress to pay for wall constructi­on.

Fellow Republican­s have told Trump that such a step would almost certainly draw opposition, both in Congress and in the courts.

Trump made the wall a central promise of his 2016 campaign, calling it necessary to combat illegal immigratio­n and drug traffickin­g. He said Mexico would pay for it, but Mexican officials rejected that. Democrats have called a wall expensive, ineffectiv­e and immoral.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel