The Jerusalem Post

Nukes and Zarif’s ‘economic terrorism,’

- ANALYSIS • By YONAH JEREMY BOB

Observers could be pardoned for falling out of their chairs upon hearing Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accuse the US of “economic terrorism” on Thursday.

It’s not just that most of Western civilizati­on views Iran as sponsoring terrorist activities throughout the Middle East and even sometimes in Europe and elsewhere.

It’s not just that most of Western civilizati­on believes that Iran is still seeking some of the five nuclear weapons that the Mossad revealed it was seeking in the early 2000s, when Israel’s spy agency appropriat­ed Tehran’s secret nuclear files in January 2018.

And in fairness to the Islamic republic, many Western countries oppose or have mixed feelings about America’s renewed sanctions campaign that started in May 2018.

But for one of the world’s leading sponsors of terrorism and a proven attempted nuclear proliferat­or to call the US sanctions campaign “terrorism” of any kind is breathtaki­ng, even for a regime that prides itself on spin-doctoring reality.

Because of all of this, Zarif’s comment would already be news as a sensationa­l item. But there was much more to his statements on Thursday than the sensationa­l aspect.

Iran is about a week away from a self-set deadline that could lead it to significan­tly escalate its so far limited violations of the 2015 nuclear deal.

The escalated violations, unlike the limited violations in July, would likely put Iran, the US and Israel on a countdown to a potential major military confrontat­ion over whether it will acquire a nuclear weapon.

At the same time, this week saw the first serious flurry of diplomacy between the US and Iran during US President Donald Trump’s tenure.

Both Trump and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on the same day that they would be potentiall­y willing to meet within weeks – probably when each of them speaks at the UN next month.

Zarif’s statements must be seen in this context, but they also present a dilemma for what Tehran needs to decide.

If Iran will only start negotiatio­ns with the US if all sanctions are first lifted (which could get Iran back to exporting between a million and two million barrels of oil per day), there will be no negotiatio­ns.

This is Zarif’s language of economic terrorism.

If Iran will start negotiatio­ns with limited sanctions relief – probably a temporary restoratio­n of US sanctions waivers to certain countries such that Iran can up its oil exports from 100,000 barrels per day to around 700,000 barrels per day – there is a real possibilit­y of negotiatio­ns.

Tehran has a history of blustering and brinkmansh­ip before making concession­s.

While there are serious debates whether the Obama administra­tion obtained enough concession­s from Iran in the 2015 deal, there was one big concession Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made, which he had promised he would never make.

He had promised he would never disassembl­e a single centrifuge for enriching uranium.

In the end, he approved disassembl­ing close to 75% of Iran’s centrifuge­s, leaving under 6,000 from the original 20,000.

The disassembl­ing and the sale of nearly all of Iran’s already enriched uranium is what pushed back Iran from attaining a nuclear weapon in three months or less, to attaining one in the current time frame of about a year.

Is Zarif’s statement a last bluster before Iran makes its first concession to get back to the negotiatin­g table in the coming weeks?

Or was Zarif’s statement a return to the Islamic republic’s uncompromi­sing stance and strategy to try to wait out Trump?

The answer to that question will determine whether the nuclear standoff greatly escalates in the coming weeks, or whether we see the first serious diplomatic moves after a 16-month standoff.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel