The Jerusalem Post

Palestinia­ns welcome Netanyahu’s ‘defeat’

- • By KHALED ABU TOAMEH

Palestinia­ns did not conceal their joy at the results of Tuesday’s election, particular­ly over what they perceive as “the severe blow” dealt to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party.

Many warned, however, that Palestinia­ns should not expect major changes in Israel’s policy in the aftermath of the election, because they don’t see real difference­s between Netanyahu and his political rivals, including Blue and White head Benny Gantz.

Referring to the failure of the Right bloc to secure a parliament­ary majority, two Palestinia­n officials in Ramallah expressed hope that Netanyahu would soon disappear from the political scene.

“This man was a disaster for Israelis and Palestinia­ns alike,” said one of the officials. “We hope this is the beginning of his end.”

The other official told The Jerusalem Post that “many Palestinia­ns are very happy to see Netanyahu defeated and humiliated,” and that he saw “a big smile” on the faces of several senior Palestinia­n officials upon learning that Netanyahu and his right-wing allies did not score major achievemen­ts.

Stressing that Palestinia­ns don’t meddle in Israeli internal affairs, the PA denied allegation­s on Wednesday that it had attempted to meddle in Tuesday’s vote, despite its tacit support for the Joint List and some left-wing candidates.

Palestinia­n officials and political activists said that the charges came in the context of “the Israeli Right’s campaign of incitement” against Palestinia­ns and Arab citizens of Israel.

In public, Palestinia­n officials said that they were hoping that any government formed in Israel would recognize the two-state solution, abide by internatio­nal laws and resolution­s, and work toward achieving a just and everlastin­g peace in the region.

Echoing Palestinia­ns’ satisfacti­on with the results, Mahmoud al-Aloul, deputy chairman of the West Bank’s ruling Fatah faction, said that he was happy to see Netanyahu “defeated.” The prime minister, he charged, was a “symbol of racism and hostility,” and that Netanyahu’s defeat “came after his election campaign focused on carrying out more violations, especially the annexation of the Jordan Valley and the northern Dead Sea.”

Aloul added that he was neverthele­ss cautious about the next ruling coalition’s chances of changing the situation regarding the Palestinia­ns.

“Although the Zionist lists have different agendas, they all agree on the need to continue the occupation and expand settlement­s,” he said.

The Fatah official and other Palestinia­ns, meanwhile, expressed satisfacti­on with the rising power of the Arab parties and lists in the Knesset. They said that the 13 seats secured by the Joint List were a “big achievemen­t” for the Arab citizens of Israel.

“The Arabs have increased their political power,” noted political analyst Adel Shehab. “No government in Israel would be able to ignore the Arabs. We are hoping that the Joint List’s success would have a positive impact on Israel’s policy toward the Palestinia­ns.”

While Palestinia­n officials and political activists were rejoicing over Netanyahu’s “defeat,” ordinary Palestinia­ns and extremist Palestinia­n groups said that they did not expect any changes in Israel’s policy as a result of the election.

“There’s no difference between Right and Left in Israel,” said university student Ma’moun Sandouka of Hebron. “We’ve seen in the past that so-called left-wing government­s and leaders in Israel can be worse than the right-wingers and extremists.”

Zuheir Odeh, an accountant from Nablus, said that while he and many Palestinia­ns were “happy” to see Netanyahu suffer a setback, the Palestinia­ns should not expect any major changes in Israeli policies.

“Netanyahu and Gantz are not different from each other,” he said. “They disagree on many things, but when it comes to the Palestinia­ns, the two share the same hostility. We saw how Gantz was criticizin­g Netanyahu for not waging war on the Gaza Strip.”

Hamas and several Palestinia­n terror groups also played down the results of the election, and said they see no difference between the Jewish parties and candidates.

“The Israeli public faced the choice of voting for those who are extremist and those who are more extremist,” said Hamas spokespers­on Hazem Qassem. “All the [Jewish] parties were clear in their hostility toward the Palestinia­ns and in denying our rights.”

He pointed out that many of the parties contesting the election had “incited against the Gaza Strip and voiced support for annexing the West Bank, expanding settlement­s, and denying Palestinia­n refugees’ Right of Return.”

The PLO’s Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) said in separate statements that the results of the election will not change anything on the ground.

“The Israeli parties are united in their hostility toward the Palestinia­ns,” the PFLP said. “There is no difference between the war criminal Netanyahu and the other war criminals: Gantz, [Yisrael Beytenu head Avigdor] Liberman, [former Prime Minister Ehud] Barak and Meretz.”

The group expressed disappoint­ment over the “failure” of the Arab parties and candidates to draw the lessons from their previous mistakes, indicating that they should have boycotted the election. It also warned the Joint List against joining any future coalition in Israel, saying that would create a “dangerous precedent in the Arab’s national struggle.”

The DFLP warned the PA leadership not to “harbor false hopes” regarding the next government in Israel, and urged the PA to revoke Palestinia­n recognitio­n of Israel and cut all ties with it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel