Mattis levels extraordinary criticism of Trump as Esper rejects use of troops
WASHINGTON (Los Angeles Times/TNS) – US President Donald Trump’s effort to use a military response to nationwide protests led to an extraordinary rupture with both his current and former secretaries of defense Wednesday, with one rejecting use of active-duty troops against protesters and the other accusing Trump of ordering the military to “violate the constitutional rights of their fellow citizens.”
The statement by former Defense Secretary James N. Mattis was without precedent, and the effects on Trump are likely to be far-reaching.
Mattis, who resigned as defense secretary in late 2018, denounced Trump for his actions on Monday, in which the president walked through Lafayette Park near the White House to pose in front of a church after protesters had been driven from the park by police and military units firing tear gas.
As a young Marine, Mattis wrote, he swore an oath to defend the Constitution.
“Never did I dream that troops taking that same oath would be ordered under any circumstance to violate the constitutional rights of their fellow citizens – much less to provide a bizarre photo op for the elected commander-in-chief, with military leadership standing alongside,” he wrote in the statement, published by The Atlantic magazine.
Mattis’s words came just hours after current Defense Secretary Mark Esper told a Pentagon news conference that he opposed using active-duty troops against protesters, saying it should be done “only in the most urgent and dire of situations.
“We are not in one of those situations now,” Esper said. “I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act,” which Trump had threatened to use to send troops into cities where state and local officials have not quelled unrest.
White House officials emphasized Tuesday that Trump still may call on active-duty troops to patrol the streets of Washington DC and other cities if the protests continue.
Esper’s comments could also leave him on shaky ground with Trump, who often forces out officials who disagree with him publicly.
Trump and other top White House officials were “not happy” with Esper’s comments, a senior Trump aide said, saying they “added to the frustration with him.”
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany offered a notably lukewarm response Wednesday when asked if Trump still has confidence in Esper. “As of right now, Secretary Esper is still Secretary Esper,” she said, noting that should things change the press would be “the first to know.”
She also said the president has the “sole authority” to invoke the Insurrection Act and that the move is still being considered.
Until Wednesday, Esper had seemed closely in sync with Trump. When he joined the president’s Monday call with governors, he urged them to “dominate the battlespace,” using a military term that many governors said was unsuited to a law enforcement task.
Esper’s move prompted quick and harsh criticism from many former Defense Department officials and retired senior officers who said that the Pentagon chief was straying into politics. Such a move might also draw the military more deeply into a controversial domestic law enforcement role.
He and Army Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, later joined Trump on a walk through Lafayette Park that evening to a church near the White House after police and Guard soldiers used pepper spray and other forceful tactics to push back what appeared to be nonviolent protesters.
But a senior defense official said Esper found himself in a “no-win situation” after trying to navigate between the need to publicly support Trump and to lead a department that prefers to keep clear of domestic involvement and politics.
“Are there officers who were uncomfortable with the prospect that their soldiers would be ordered onto the streets with orders to crack down on the Americans protesting racial injustice? Very much so,” said a senior military commander, who spoke on the condition that he not be identified. “Did some express their views up the chain that sending in troops was a bad idea. Yes.”
Lt. Col. Daniel Davis, a retired Army officer and a fellow at Defense Priorities, a Washington think tank that favors limited use of the armed forces, said, “Law enforcement and the National Guard receive training for domestic crowd-control operations and are experienced in the local conditions necessary to keep protesters safe while preventing the proliferation of violence. Active duty troops, however, are trained primarily to kill the enemy in war zones.”
Esper also faced criticism from retired senior military officers and former Defense Department officials, some of whom said he had stepped over the proper line for a defense secretary in his earlier backing of Trump advocacy of a military response.
“You may not have been able to stop President Trump from directing this appalling use of force, but you could have chosen to oppose it. Instead you visibly supported it,” James N. Miller, a former senior Pentagon official, wrote to Esper on Tuesday in a letter resigning from a Defense Department advisory board. “I must now ask: if last night’s blatant violations do not cross the line for you, what will?”
Esper also faces quiet but mounting opposition from retired senior officers, who say they are uncomfortable with the more prominent role the US military is playing in tamping down protests.
“I remain confident in the professionalism of our men and women in uniform,” retired Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs under former US presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, wrote this week in The Atlantic. “But I am less confident in the soundness of the orders they will be given by this commander in chief.”
So far, only National Guard troops have been deployed against protesters in cities and states across the country, which is permitted under federal law as long as they are under state control.
Trump quickly turned to the military after riots erupted in Minnesota and many other states, following the death of George Floyd, an African American man, who died after a white Minneapolis police officer, Derek Chauvin, pressed his knee into Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes.
In a call between Trump and governors on Monday, Esper urged states to “dominate the battlespace” to put down protests. Among other steps, Esper also ordered approximately 1,600 active-duty troops near Washington, so they would be in place in case Trump invokes the Insurrection Act.
The fallout from those moves led Esper and Pentagon aides to backtrack as criticism of his role mounted in recent days.
In an interview with NBC News on Tuesday night, Esper said he was given no notice before Trump led him and other senior administration officials to the church near Lafayette Park for a widely criticized photo opportunity.
Esper told reporters he believed they were going to observe the vandalized public bathroom in Lafayette Square.
“I did know that, following the president’s remarks on Monday evening, that many of us were going to join President Trump and review the damage in Lafayette Park, and at St. John’s Episcopal Church,” Esper said Wednesday. “What I was not aware of was exactly where we were going, when we arrived at the church, and what the plans were once we got there.
Esper said he also regretted using the term “battlespace” this week to describe areas gripped by protests.
“In retrospect, I would use different wording so as not to distract from the more important matters at hand or allow some to suggest that we are militarizing the issue,” he said.
Esper strongly criticized the actions of Minneapolis police, in whose custody George Floyd died. Esper called the act “murder” and “a horrible crime.”