The Jerusalem Post

UNHRC condemns Israeli annexation plans, calls for report on its potential impact

- • By TOVAH LAZAROFF

The United Nations Human Rights Council on Monday condemned pending Israeli annexation plans. It also approved the annual settlement­s resolution with a 36-2 vote and nine abstention­s as it wrapped up its 43rd session in Geneva.

The UNHRC called on UN High Commission­er for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet to prepare a report on the impact of annexation for its 46th session next March.

“We have to stand firm and say ‘no’ to what Israel and America are doing in this area,” PLO Ambassador Ibrahim Khraishi told the council. “It is flagrantly denying rights and flying in the face of internatio­nal law.”

The controvers­ial settlement­s resolution, which has been used in past years to call for the creation of a database of businesses operating in Jewish areas located over the pre-1967 lines, continued to call for a boycott of such businesses and to warn that those who engaged in such activity were liable to be penalized under internatio­nal law.

The text also expressed its concern over settler violence and called for the confiscati­on of settlers’ arms.

The settlement­s resolution was one of five pro-Palestinia­n and anti-Israeli texts the 47-member body approved during its 43rd session.

Israel was the only country against which such a high number of resolution­s were leveled. Four were approved Monday and one was passed on Friday with regard to accountabi­lity, which included a call for an arms embargo.

Only six other countries had resolution­s in their name with respect to human-rights issues. In each case it was a singular resolution, and not all of those texts were condemnati­ons. They included Iran, Syria, South Sudan, Myanmar, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and Nicaragua.

Khraishi called on the internatio­nal community to take a strong stand against Israeli annexation plans. According to the US peace plan, Israel can annex 30% of the West Bank, including the Jordan Valley and the northern Dead Sea.

“It’s a circus that we are witnessing in the US,” Khraishi said. “It seems as if the US is deciding the fate of the Palestinia­n people without referring to internatio­nal resolution­s... [US President Donald] Trump is giving free rein to Israel and saying more or less, ‘You can annex these areas.’”

“We have to, sooner or later, stop this situation,” he said.

Khraishi likened the Palestinia­ns’

situation to that of the Black Lives Matter movement in the US.

He accused Israel of crimes against humanity and of “exploiting” the Holocaust for its own political gain. Israel had brought Jews from outside to displace Palestinia­ns, Khraishi said.

Australia and the Marshall Islands were Israel’s staunchest supporters. Australia rejected all five of the resolution­s, and the Marshall Islands rejected four, including the settlement­s resolution. Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, the Czech Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Slovenia, Togo and Ukraine abstained from the settlement­s resolution.

Of the 36 countries that approved the measures, five were European: Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain.

The vote on the settlement­s resolution and three others that took place Monday occurred under Agenda Item 7. The UNHRC at every session is mandated to debate alleged Israeli human-rights abuses under this agenda item. No other country has such a set mandate.

Australian Ambassador Sally Mansfield said her country was opposed to “biased” and “one-sided resolution­s.” Nowhere was this bias more apparent than in the existence of Item 7, which damages the credibilit­y of the council, she said.

“Our vote against these resolution­s represents a vote against the disproport­ionate focus that holds Israel to a higher degree of scrutiny than any other state,” Mansfield said.

Czech Ambassador Petr Gajdusek called for the UNHRC to remove Item 7 from its agenda. It also opposed the council’s call for a report on annexation, noting that the body should seek a more appropriat­e response that would occur in real time.

The resolution on alleged Israeli human-rights abuses in the Palestinia­n territorie­s passed 42-2, with three abstention­s. Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Togo abstained.

The resolution affirming the right of the Palestinia­n people to self-determinat­ion passed 43-2, with two abstention­s. Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of the Congo abstained.

The resolution condemning Israeli sovereignt­y on the Golan Heights passed 26-17, with four abstention­s.

Opposing the measure were Australia, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, Marshall Islands, Netherland­s, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Slovakia, Spain, Togo and Ukraine.

Cameroon, Congo, Fiji and the Philippine­s abstained.

 ?? (Screenshot/UN Web TV) ?? THE UN Human Rights Council approves the settlement­s resolution with a 36-2 vote and nine abstention­s on Monday.
(Screenshot/UN Web TV) THE UN Human Rights Council approves the settlement­s resolution with a 36-2 vote and nine abstention­s on Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel