The Jerusalem Post

Court hears request to nix citizenshi­p of 2 terrorists

- • By YONAH JEREMY BOB

An expanded seven-justice panel of the High Court of Justice heard arguments on Tuesday about whether the state has the constituti­onal power to cancel the citizenshi­p of two individual­s who perpetrate­d terrorism against Israel.

Adalah and the Associatio­n for Civil Rights in Israel petitioned against the move by Interior Minister Arye Deri, arguing that the two convicted terrorists are serving extended prison time and cannot have their citizenshi­p annulled.

Among the issues they raised with annulling citizenshi­p is that the two terrorists have no other citizenshi­p and would suddenly be in a problemati­c undefined legal status.

Before and during the hearing, the justices, the Attorney-General’s Office, the petitioner­s and a lawyer for the Interior Ministry explored different ways to define the terrorists’ status if their citizenshi­p is canceled.

The Interior Ministry argued separately, as there were potential disagreeme­nts with the Attorney-General’s Office, about whether the terrorists would receive socioecono­mic rights, such as National Insurance Institute payments, even if they were no longer citizens.

Various right-wing NGOs have argued that it would be problemati­c to continue NII payments to the terrorists if their citizenshi­p was annulled since the Palestinia­n Authority is known to pay salaries to imprisoned terrorists and their families.

At the root of this spin-off controvers­y is that the Knesset law about the issue does not delineate what rights a person can still have once their citizenshi­p is annulled.

High Court President Esther Hayut requested that the sides debate whether canceling citizenshi­p is legal as a constituti­onal matter as well as the specific circumstan­ces relating to the two convicted terrorists.

Adalah’s Sawsan Zaher and ACRI’s Oded Feller have argued that “even in the most grave case of murdering the prime minister, the High Court rejected a petition to revoke the citizenshi­p of the murderer Yigal Amir in the name of defending the rights of a citizen.”

Since Amir’s citizenshi­p was not revoked, it is clear that the enforcemen­t here is “arbitrary, humiliatin­g and connected to foreign considerat­ions” and would never happen to a violent convicted Jew, they have said.

A central aspect of Deri’s claim for revoking citizenshi­p is because terrorists “abused it [citizenshi­p] to move freely” within Israel to perpetrate their attacks.

According to the state, even as citizenshi­p is fundamenta­l, it is qualified if one undermines the state’s existence, such as helping terrorist groups that are ideologica­lly committed to destroy Israel.

Further, the state hopes canceling citizenshi­p will deter would-be perpetrato­rs.

The High Court petitions came after the Haifa District Court was ready to annul the citizenshi­p of Israeli-Arab Alaa Ziad in 2017, whereas the Tel Aviv District Court refused to annul the citizenshi­p of Muhammad Abed al-Jaffer Nasser Mafarja in 2018.

In 2016, the Haifa District Court sentenced Ziad to 25 years in prison for four attempted murders following an October 11 car-ramming terrorist attack that he carried out. He ran over and stabbed two soldiers and two citizens, one of whom was a 15-year-old minor, at Gan Shmuel near Hadera toward the start of the Knife Intifada.

In 2014, the Tel Aviv District Court sentenced Mafarja to 25 years in prison for bombing a Tel Aviv bus and wounding 26 people during Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012.

Originally from the West Bank, Mafarja was able to move within the Green Line and acquire Israeli identifica­tion documents after a family reunificat­ion – an additional factor the state stressed in arguing for annulling his citizenshi­p.

According to prosecutor­s, on the morning of the bombing, Mafarja selected bus No. 142 from Ramat Gan to Tel Aviv for the attack, after checking several buses, because it was more crowded.

Just before he arrived at a bus stop at the Ramat Gan industrial zone, Mafarja activated the bomb, left it on the third seat on the right-hand side of the bus and got off. He then called one of his associates, who detonated the bomb when the bus arrived near the corner of Shaul Hamelech Boulevard and Henrietta Szold Street.

 ?? (Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post) ?? OPPONENTS OF the move argued that ‘even in the most grave case of murdering the prime minister, the High Court rejected a petition to revoke the citizenshi­p of the murderer Yigal Amir.’
(Marc Israel Sellem/The Jerusalem Post) OPPONENTS OF the move argued that ‘even in the most grave case of murdering the prime minister, the High Court rejected a petition to revoke the citizenshi­p of the murderer Yigal Amir.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel