The Jerusalem Post

Trojan horse for antisemiti­sm in Norway

- • By JONATHAN A. GREENBLATT The writer is CEO and national director of ADL (the Anti-Defamation League).

Two decades ago, I co-founded Ethos Brands based on the principle that a company can do well by doing good. We sold bottled water and used the profits to bring clean drinking water to children in need around the world. Our plan was successful: not only did we raise awareness about the world water crisis and donate funds to communitie­s in need, but we were also acquired by Starbucks.

This same philosophy drives the environmen­tal, social, and governance (ESG) movement, a significan­t and growing segment of the capital markets. Over the past few years, the ESG movement has encountere­d spirited opposition from those who argue that a company’s sole obligation is to maximize profits for shareholde­rs – not be concerned about, for example, the needs of a broader set of stakeholde­rs.

While I disagree with much of ESG’s critics, I hope we all – ESG proponents and opponents – can agree that ESG should not be a Trojan horse for antisemiti­sm and hate. Yet, that is precisely what is at risk with an expected decision by Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, one of the world’s largest investors, to divest its holding in Israeli banks in the coming days.

Attacking the banks of a country is a form of economic warfare. It is next level – a drastic measure normally reserved for the most virulent actors on the world stage. Such a move by Norway will invigorate the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, a radical campaign that aims to delegitimi­ze and isolate Israel, the world’s only Jewish state, including by manipulati­ng ESG.

There was a time in recent memory when Norway was an honest broker in the region. Through its sponsorshi­p and facilitati­on of the ground-breaking “Oslo process” in the early 1990s – which led to the first Israeli-Palestinia­n agreement; the establishm­ent of Palestinia­n self-governance through the Palestinia­n Authority; and broad acceptance for the importance of working towards a two-state solution – Norway was a creative and constructi­ve force for Israeli-Palestinia­n reconcilia­tion.

Divesting from Israeli banks because they offer services in the West Bank is antithetic­al to this legacy. It is an act that punishes both Israeli and Palestinia­n businesses and consumers. Moreover, this ill-conceived and counterpro­ductive investment decision does nothing to promote positive initiative­s that could ameliorate the conflict, or improve the situation on the ground.

We do not know the personal motivation­s of the so-called Council of Ethics at the fund that is making this recommenda­tion, but what we do know, is that singling out companies that happen to be located in the Jewish state is as prejudicia­l as singling out people who happen to be Jewish. It’s antisemiti­c.

Consider that the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund owns about 1.5% of all listed shares globally across about 9,000 companies. It excludes only 23 companies for violations of human rights. Of this group, nine – a full third of all the companies excluded – are Israeli.

MEANWHILE, REGARDING China – which has 10 times the number of publicly traded companies and more than 100 times the population of Israel – the Norwegian fund only excludes two companies. This is despite the repressive actions of the Chinese regime, both on its general population and the systematic violence directed toward its own Uighur population.

In addition, it is puzzling why a fund so concerned with ethical behavior is still invested in Russian banks under Western sanctions, such as Sberbank and VTB, and still invested in major Russian energy companies whose businesses provide vital revenue to the Russian government, allowing it to maintain its brutal and unprovoked assault on Ukraine.

The disproport­ionate focus on Israel is indisputab­le, contemptib­le, and unfortunat­ely all too common as radical activists attempt to hijack the ESG movement to drive their own agenda, in this case demonizing and delegitimi­zing the Jewish state.

Make no mistake: the BDS movement is not focused on changing Israeli government policy, improving the lives of Palestinia­ns, or creating a Palestinia­n state alongside Israel. Rather, it seeks the complete dismantlin­g of the Jewish state and ending the right to Jewish self-determinat­ion in its historic homeland, Israel.

Unfortunat­ely, the BDS movement is gaining traction in the corporate world. According to ADL research, during last year’s shareholde­r proxy season, eight of the 20 social issue resolution­s explicitly targeting foreign countries named Israel – making it the number-one target in the world. Again, not Iran, nor Russia, nor North Korea, nor Syria, nor Venezuela, nor Ethiopia, nor China, but Israel – a vibrant, pluralisti­c and open democracy.

Last year, Ben and Jerry’s made news when they announced that they would not sell ice cream in the West Bank, effectivel­y ending the company’s presence in all of Israel and eliminatin­g hundreds of jobs for Palestinia­ns and Israelis. General Mills – the giant food company – pulled their Pillsbury brand out of Israel after a multi-year campaign by BDS activists.

And the ratings agency, Morningsta­r adopted policies that would make doing business with the Jewish state a black mark on their ESG ratings. Due to pressure from a range of stakeholde­rs including ADL, some of these moves were reversed, but the hard feelings endure.

After more than 100 years of fighting antisemiti­sm and hate, we have learned how important it is to speak up and act. It’s why ADL now calls on business leaders and investors to speak up and tell the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund what they are doing is wrong.

It’s why we urge the Administra­tion and Congress to tell Norway’s leaders that what this sovereign wealth fund is doing, in the name of the Norwegian people and with their money, is antisemiti­c. It runs counter to US foreign policy interests and the shared values of our nations. It does not advance peace, but accelerate­s prejudice, plain and simple.

There’s tremendous potential in the ESG movement. But if it can be manipulate­d so easily by malicious actors, such abuse will irredeemab­ly stain its laudable mission. As one of the world’s largest investors, the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund has an ethical responsibi­lity to prevent that from happening and cease its efforts to target Israel.

 ?? (Reuters) ?? PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu meets then-Norwegian foreign minister Bjorn Tore Godal in Tel Aviv, in 1997. There was a time in recent memory when Norway was an honest broker in the region, says the writer.
(Reuters) PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu meets then-Norwegian foreign minister Bjorn Tore Godal in Tel Aviv, in 1997. There was a time in recent memory when Norway was an honest broker in the region, says the writer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Israel