Between trauma and integration: Druze Israelis navigate complex identity
Husein, 31, speaks to me from the Druze town of Usfiya and insists on showing me the magnificent greenery of Mount Carmel around him. “This is the western neighborhood of town. It’s got people from all religions and even people from abroad who come and live here due to the proximity to Haifa University. It’s a microcosm of Israeli society.”
He’s married, has two children, and has served for over 10 years in the IDF, first in the artillery corps. and then in the intelligence corps. Now, Hussein works as part of a content-creating war room established within DTech (short for Druze Tech), an initiative to accelerate the integration of Israeli Druze into the hi-tech sector.
“Before October 7, Druze society in Israel was caught in the midst of an ongoing crisis, against the backdrop of the Nation-State law and the Kaminitz Law,” Hussein explains; the former referring to the 2018 Basic Law granting the Jewish people alone the right to self-determination, and Hebrew the status of only official language; and the latter referring to a law strengthening law enforcement options in the field of unauthorized building.
Hussein continues: “The
Nation State law may not have any technical implications, or maybe it only has ones that we will find in the long term, but the second law affects our everyday ability to plan and build for future generations.
“It’s been over 70 years, and nobody seems to have any willingness or ability to solve it. At first, I thought it was solely our blame, as our local councils truly lack the required professionalism. But as I dug deeper, I discovered that they share the blame with the Ministry of Interior, which isn’t much of a partner and does not allocate any budgets nor does it make any efforts to solve this issue.”
Hussein foresees that the next generation will pose a strategic challenge. “If I grew up with my grandfather’s stories about the relations between Druze and the Yishuv, enlisted in the army, etc. – the next generation will already grow into a reality where the main theme is these laws and the feelings of being deserted. Unfortunately,
we may be seeing a decline in enlistment rates and identification with the state.
Then Hussein quickly clarifies: “Our crisis is with the government, not with the state. If I personally come across some form of racism, I have my history and my family’s experience to counter it. But unfortunately, that is not the case in this reality which the next Druze generation lives in.”
And then came October 7. “Our society enlisted immediately and without hesitation. This includes Druze activists who were some of the strongest voices from the large protests we saw last year and even before that; some of which were contemplating not showing up for reserve duty at all ever again. Some were injured during the fighting and went straight back in. They said that a war is a war, and it’s not even a question. Again, we are in pain and feel disappointed in the government, but we still stand
strong with the state.”
Seven Druze warriors fell during the battles against Hamas and other fundamentalist terrorist groups in Gaza. “There used to be a specific Druze battalion called Herev (sword) where most Druze would enlist without much choice. Then that battalion was dismantled, and we started seeing more and more Druze representation in other units, including elite ones. Much of it is thanks to Hebrew courses provided by the IDF, which help young Druze soldiers to fit in more properly and try out new opportunities.”
On October 7, Hussein was still on active duty. He joined the war room after he was released a couple of weeks ago, following what he describes as being impressed by both the idea and the execution. “I’m also drawn into this field of innovation, the Druze society, and the connection to Israel.” Hussein now runs the war room himself, comprised of six content creators, including a professional photographer and filmmaker.
The war room started after Koftan Halabi, head of the local council, learned that the Diaspora Ministry was looking to support local initiatives during the war. Halabi had been an Israel advocate in the past, speaking with Jewish communities abroad, and after October 7 he connected with “Kolot Israel,” an initiative looking to amplify pro-Israel voices online. “They had the idea of setting up a war room to create content in Arabic, as there isn’t much competition in the field,” adds Hussein.
“Today the war room has no strings attached, and it does not operate under any ministry,” he adds, explaining that it grants them more freedom to act according to their knowledge and beliefs.
“The word ‘Hasbara’ is nowadays phonetically transcribed and used in Arabic in a negative way to mean propaganda,” explains Hussein. “Many across the Arab world are sure that the October 7 events were either staged or completely made up. This is a different audience that must have its tactics and strategies while being approached.
“We amplify Arab Israeli voices who are more authentic than the regular faces promoting Israeli messages in Arabic,” he says, adding that they tend to stay away from identifying as Druze due to what he describes as an overall negative sentiment towards the Levantine ethno-religious group in mainstream Arabic speaking spheres.
Though the war room is only in its starting phases, its content has already got over 60,000 views on TikTok during the first couple of weeks, with some videos reaching an average of 7,700 views in 24 hours.
“We promote scenes of coexistence and everyday lives, but we don’t butter up or sugarcoat reality because our audience is far from being stupid. We try to build trust, and bring different narratives. We also started to create content about the municipal elections in Israel as part of the process of building a following.
Hussein describes some peculiar responses. “We once made a short clip about the Bedouin hostages, and we got comments reading that ‘Gaza had already sacrificed much for the Palestinian cause, so now it’s the ’48 Arabs’ turn’. In our content we must deal psychologically and sociologically with different cultural codes and a different grasping of reality,” he explains.
Hussein chooses to end
on an optimistic note. “Though war is tough, and the massacre was horrendous, I hope that some new opportunities will arise from these harsh conditions. Not too long ago I saw a photograph from 1948 of a Druze warrior wearing traditional attire. I hope that the pact between the Jewish and Druze communities will continue to grow stronger; and that a new pact will also be formed with the Arab countries around us through the expansion of the Abraham Accords. This would lead to a better future for everyone in the area, a future of security, and thriving for all commu
STATE
conscription law, which is rightly known as the evasion law, and about the budget that you passed,” he said.
The vote also resolved a political problem for Netanyahu, Lapid stated.
I am glad that you explained in English, relying on the fact that not everyone here knows English, that you are ready to negotiate with the Palestinians. I think that after the Palestinian Authority did not condemn its massacre on October 7, it is not a good idea for the prime minister of Israel to stand here and say that he is ready to negotiate the establishment of a Palestinian state, but if you feel like turning left, turn left,” Lapid stated.
MK Oded Forer (Yisrael Beytenu), whose party opposes Palestinian statehood also accused Netanyahu of holding the vote as a part of a political ploy to confuse his supporters.
“This is a ploy. Netanyahu is opposed to unilateral Palestinian statehood, but simultaneously he has promised the Saudis that within the framework of an agreement with them, he will agree to the creation of a Palestinian state.
“We in Yisrael Beytenu oppose Palestinian statehood
in any form, two-sided or unilaterally,” said Forer, whose party is in the opposition.
To those in the coalition, Forer warned that it would be best to sleep “with your shoes on and your eyes open, so that you don’t wake up one day and find that you are part of a government and a coalition that is establishing a Palestinian state.”
Labor’s four Knesset members decided not to participate in the vote. Party chairwoman MK Merav Michaeli explained the decision by claiming that the vote was a “circus.”
“There are currently 134 citizens in Hamas captivity in Gaza, 134 for whom Netanyahu is doing everything to ensure that we do not pay attention that he is not bringing them back,” Michaeli said.
The nine votes opposing the resolution came from the Knesset’s two Arab parties.
MK Waleed Taha (Ra’am) said that Palestinian statehood wasn’t something the government was gifting the Palestinians but rather an essential Israeli interest and a fundamental Palestinian right.
Without Palestinian statehood, there would either be a binational or an apartheid state, he said.
MK Ayman Odeh (HadashTa’al) called on the international community and Israel to recognize Palestinian statehood.
This is a people who have fought for 100 years against “colonialism” and “apartheid” without ever once raising a white flag.
The whole world is talking about Palestinian statehood, but this is how Netanyahu is ending his career, by opposing it, Odeh said.
During the plenum debate, shouting ensued, with Ta’al member Ahmed Tibi saying, “A Palestinian state will be established Ras Ben Amo [Arabic slang for in ‘spite of his opposition’].” In response, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said, “Go to Syria. Terrorist.”